2000
DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200001000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPR Dose Reconstruction for Russian Nuclear Workers

Abstract: The present paper describes results of the first independent evaluation of the accuracy of the dose-reconstruction technique by electron paramagnetic resonance using tooth enamel. Each of twenty-four teeth donated by Mayak nuclear workers with known occupational radiation exposure histories was cut into two parts so that each tooth could be shared for blind electron paramagnetic resonance examination by at least two of the four laboratories participating in the study. The mean difference (+/- SD) between elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another intercomparison is commonly called "Semipalatinsk Intercomparison" because one of its goals was to collectively measure doses to teeth of residents of the Semipalatinsk region (Chapter 18) Ivannikov et al, 2007). There were also a few bilateral intercomparisons (Vanhavere et al, 1997;Romanyukha et al, 2000b;Shishkina et al, 2001b, p. 17-21).…”
Section: International Intercomparisons and "Blind" Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another intercomparison is commonly called "Semipalatinsk Intercomparison" because one of its goals was to collectively measure doses to teeth of residents of the Semipalatinsk region (Chapter 18) Ivannikov et al, 2007). There were also a few bilateral intercomparisons (Vanhavere et al, 1997;Romanyukha et al, 2000b;Shishkina et al, 2001b, p. 17-21).…”
Section: International Intercomparisons and "Blind" Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exposure had been denied by the Soviet government until that moment. In this case, EPR dosimetry was used to validate the external doses provided by occupational dosimetry for workers who were neither exposed to neutrons nor contaminated internally (Romanyukha et al, 1994;Romanyukha et al, 1996c;Romanyukha et al, 2000b;Romanov et al, 2002). That reconstruction made it possible to evaluate the reliability of several occupational dosimetry systems used in the plant in the past 50 years (Wieser et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Nuclear Workers Of the Mayak Production Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EPR of teeth is now a well-established method for evaluating absorbed doses to individuals under many circumstances (Egersdorfer et al, 1996, Pass, 1997, IAEA, 2002, Fattibene and Callens, 2010, Ainsbury et al, 2011, Sullivan et al, 2013and Degteva et al, 2015. The method has been tested against biodosimetry methods (e.g., Nakamura et al, 1998and Khvostunov et al, 2015 and conventional dosimeters (e.g., Romanyukha et al, 2000b), and in multiple inter-laboratory comparisons (e.g., Chumak et al, 1996, Wieser et al, 2000a.…”
Section: Epr Of Teethmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the radicals can remain stable for a period longer than the expected lifetime of humans, 1) the ESR dosimetry technique has been applied to survivors of the atomic bomb detonation, 3) residents affected by the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident 4) and workers in a Russian nuclear facility. 5) Intensity of ESR signals has been related to dose accumulated in tooth enamel. [6][7][8][9][10] Individual dose reconstruction, however, ultimately requires doses to organs of interest, while ESR dosimetry determines just tooth enamel dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%