Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2983-7_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epiphytes of Seagrasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

8
164
2
6

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
164
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial consumption of C was probably enhanced (Danovaro et al 2003), accelerating C cycling (López et al 1995(López et al , 1998. Epiphytes, which are known to contribute sig- nificantly to seagrass ecosystem production (Borowitzka et al 2006, Ouisse et al 2010, were not related to either C production or consumption (Apostolaki et al 2011). In contrast, NCP decreased with decreasing shoot density (annual mean 145 and 312 shoot m −2 at cages and control station, respectively; ob tained from Apostolaki et al 2009) close to the fish cages (linear regression, intercept = −1.22, slope = 0.10, R 2 = 0.52, p < 0.01), indicating declining metabolic activity of the seagrass ecosystem upon sediment nutrient enrichment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial consumption of C was probably enhanced (Danovaro et al 2003), accelerating C cycling (López et al 1995(López et al , 1998. Epiphytes, which are known to contribute sig- nificantly to seagrass ecosystem production (Borowitzka et al 2006, Ouisse et al 2010, were not related to either C production or consumption (Apostolaki et al 2011). In contrast, NCP decreased with decreasing shoot density (annual mean 145 and 312 shoot m −2 at cages and control station, respectively; ob tained from Apostolaki et al 2009) close to the fish cages (linear regression, intercept = −1.22, slope = 0.10, R 2 = 0.52, p < 0.01), indicating declining metabolic activity of the seagrass ecosystem upon sediment nutrient enrichment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grazing pressure and nutrient availability are considered to be major sources of variability of epiphyte biomass in seagrass meadows (Borowitzka et al, 2006). Sea urchins and herbivore fishes reduce the epiphyte load on Posidonia oceanica leaves (Alcoverro et al, 1997b;Tomas et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epiphytes are naturally occurring organisms that grow upon plants (as defined by Borowitzka & Lethbridge 1989, Borowitzka et al 2006. The ratio of epiphyte biomass to aboveground seagrass biomass (or plant surface area) is often referred to as the epiphyte load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, an increase in epiphyte biomass re lative to a stable seagrass biomass results in an in creased epiphyte load. Epiphyte load (and com position) is the manifestation of a complex interaction of many factors, including light, temperature, nutrients, grazing pressure, hydrodynamics and propa gule supply (Borowitzka & Lethbridge 1989, Borowitzka et al 2006. Consequently, seagrass epiphytes are often temporally and spatially variable in the natural environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%