2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03762-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrustable professional activities for Junior Brazilian Medical Students in community medicine

Abstract: Background Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) have been defined to promote the workplace participation of undergraduate medical students, generally in the context of high-income countries with a focus on the secondary and tertiary health care sectors. These EPAs have limited applicability to training and health care contexts in low- to middle-income countries that have a focus on primary health care, for instance, the context of community medicine. The purpose of this article is to repo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, at the beginning of the project, we invited course leaders from all levels of medical units across the country to attend courses and discussion meetings to let them understand the core idea of CBME and the EPAs evaluation method. Then, we used the NGT and modi ed Delphi method to conduct several consensus processes [46,47], including paper-based data discussions and face-to-face meetings. These two methods provide anonymous and non-hierarchical discussion patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, at the beginning of the project, we invited course leaders from all levels of medical units across the country to attend courses and discussion meetings to let them understand the core idea of CBME and the EPAs evaluation method. Then, we used the NGT and modi ed Delphi method to conduct several consensus processes [46,47], including paper-based data discussions and face-to-face meetings. These two methods provide anonymous and non-hierarchical discussion patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, at the beginning of the project, we invited course leaders from all levels of medical units across the country to attend courses and discussion meetings to let them understand the core idea of CBME and the EPAs evaluation method. Then, we used the FGD and modified Delphi method to conduct several consensus processes [ 25 , 46 ], including paper-based data discussions and face-to-face meetings. These two methods provide anonymous and non-hierarchical discussion patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%