Entrepreneurial learning

Wang, Catherine L.; Chugh, Harveen

doi:10.4324/9781315857817-2

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This section addresses relevant strands of prior work in entrepreneurial learning with the topic of peripherality. Taking a definition of entrepreneurial learning as “recognising and acting on opportunities as a natural process which can be applied within both everyday practice and formal education” (Rae, 2015, p. 5), the topic has itself moved from a peripheral to a more central role in this subject over the past 15 years, although Wang and Chugh (2015) remark on the lack of consensus in defining the topic and on the predisposition to considering how individual learning can be integrated into collective or organisational learning. They address three significant types of learning (individual and collective, exploratory and exploitative, and intuitive and sensing) in relation to future challenges for the subject: how to integrate individual opportunity-seeking with organisational advantage-seeking behaviours; developing skills and resources for opportunity exploration and exploitation; and the need for understanding how entrepreneurial opportunities arise (Wang and Chugh, 2015, p. 36).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurial learning: peripherality and connectedness

Rae

2017

IJEBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis article explores the roles of peripherality and centrality in relation to entrepreneurial learning and development. Peripherality has previously been considered from a mainly geographical perspective as being remote, loosely connected, and marginal. A broader conception of the topic is addressed, asking: in what ways is peripherality relevant to entrepreneurial learning? How can centre-peripheral connectivity enhance this? What are the implications for communities, learners and educators? Design/methodology/approachDiscourses of entrepreneurship development relating to policy, economics, geography and culture favour the concept of centres, which attract attention, resources, activities and people. Whilst peripherality is an enduring topic of interest in regional studies, it is widened through using the conceptualisation of Legitimate Peripheral Participation in social learning as a methodological lens for the study. A case study of the technology sector in Cape Breton, Canada is included to illustrate peripheral entrepreneurship. FindingsThe article suggests ways in which peripheral-central relationships can be a positive factor in entrepreneurial learning. It suggests that rebalancing the bidirectional 'flow' of knowledge, talent and resources between centres and peripheries can enhance the value of peripheral entrepreneurship, learning and innovation. Social implicationsThe article connects with prior work on community economic development, offering observations for entrepreneurial learning and development of knowledge-intensive businesses in peripheral areas. Boundaryspanning leadership and skills are required to facilitate peripheral-central interaction and entrepreneurship. Value/OriginalityPeripherality is defined more widely than in prior work, suggesting peripheral learning is part of the fundamental human experience and offers new insights, innovations and opportunities which can create shared value. A conceptual framework for peripheral-central entrepreneurial learning is proposed, which may assist in rebalancing central-peripheral value creation, innovation and regeneration.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurial learning: peripherality and connectedness

Rae

2017

IJEBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(Mihalache & Mihalache, 2016); 3. Synthesizing and organizing the literature content in a particular domain (Wang & Chugh, 2015).…”

Section: Review Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From that, SLR help to expose paradigms of the current knowledge. Also, SLR could be applied in various fields such as construction (Ahmad et al, 2019;Taroun, 2014), entrepreneurial learning (Wang & Chugh, 2015), and Lean management (Danese et al, 2018). In this study, the authors adopted the SLR in three stages, which several authors suggested (Mostafa et al, 2016;Xia et al, 2018).…”

Section: Review Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk management in green building: a review of the current state of research and future directions

Nguyen

Macchion

2022

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been considerable interest in investigating risk factors in Green Building (GB) projects, with increasing debates in recent years. This study aims to investigate tendencies and identify gaps in the GB risk literature, which can define future research guidelines, with an extensive analysis of the latest contributions. A systematic literature review was conducted by analyzing 64 relevant studies from 2006 to 2020. The results revealed that the GB risk topic is somewhat nascent but growing and almost limited to several countries, including Singapore, the USA, Australia, and China. Notably, this research discovered and classified the main themes of GB risk studies: (1) identify risk factors in implementing GB projects, (2) create risk assessment models for GB projects, (3) study according to specific types of GB risks, and (4) investigate risks in green retrofit projects. Also, a comprehensive list of GB risk factors was provided that could be a helpful reference for industry practitioners and future researchers. Furthermore, this research identified gaps in the current literature, such as inconsistency in identifying GB risk factors, lack of investigation of the relationship between GB risks and project outcomes, and lack of exploring in cross-country or developing countries. Finally, this research suggested future research directions to enrich the literature. Thus, this study contributes a valuable platform for both practitioners and researchers to comprehend the development of the GB risk literature.

show abstract

“…Systematically reviewing literature is a meticulous and replicable procedure that yields reliable results (Dionisio & de Vargas, 2019; Vrontis & Christofi, 2019). The advantages of a systematic review over a narrative review include enhanced quality of the procedures and outcomes owing to thorough search criteria (Christofi et al, 2017, 2021), greater validity of the procedure due to replicability of the review process (Wang & Chugh, 2015), and minimization of bias due to rigorous literature search (De Menezes & Kelliher, 2011).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We followed Wang and Chugh (2015) and Paul and Criado (2020) regarding search boundaries and coverage periods to determine this study's inclusion criteria. The search boundaries were set as electronic databases – namely, ProQuest, Science Direct, Emerald and Google Scholar – because they cover a great breadth of articles regarding service failure and recovery and allow full access.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Burden of Double Deviation in Services: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda

Suresh

Chawla

2022

Int J Consumer Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Double deviation (failure to satisfactorily recover from a service failure) is a common phenomenon that has recently attracted significant research interest, but the academic literature lacks a study mapping and synthesizing the field. This article undertakes filling this gap by systematically reviewing the double deviation literature. The review classifies the literature into causes, consequences, moderators, and double service recovery and identifies research themes and future research directions within them. Key current research themes are ineffective recovery remedies and cognitive appraisal criteria as causes; emotivational goals, revengeful and reparative behaviours as consequences; firm-customer relationship-based variables as moderators; and unique tactics of double service recovery. Reassessing the scope of double deviation, uncovering customers' discrete emotions during double deviation and ascertaining the commercial viability of double service recovery are some recommendations for future research.

show abstract

Entrepreneurial learning

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Entrepreneurial learning: peripherality and connectedness

Entrepreneurial learning: peripherality and connectedness

Risk management in green building: a review of the current state of research and future directions

The Burden of Double Deviation in Services: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About