Enterprise Risk Management in Supply Chains

Olson, David L.; Wu, Desheng Dash

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11474-8_1

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 29 publications

(29 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, the size and quality of the necessary facilities to this phase are included, and different options are evaluated such as estimates of overall costs, operational performance and benefits generated by the project. Complementing the approach, Olson (2015) [4], one can identify that the relatively small costs can impact the management of a project and therefore become necessary cost-benefit analyzes, formal or informal, to accompany the initial specifications of a project. Thus, we present below the estimates of facilities and costs for The structure used for making the treatment module to the dairy industry in this study is in Table 8, and observes the value of the area to be immobilized to the deposit treatment module and its respective cost.…”

Section: %mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Olson and Wu (2010) [4], the possibility to follow up the evolution of projects that include feasibility, market, etc., can be designed and monitored by their potential key success indicators, which enable the monitoring of faults, structural weaknesses and structuring scenarios by organizations. Basu (2014) [5] emphasizes the importance of CSFs selection with the assertiveness of the objectives and the selection of monitoring requirements for assessing them.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of a Model with Critical Factors of Success, Predominant in Implementation of a Membrane System in the Wastewater Treatment—Review of the Case Study of a Dairy Industry

Faitão¹,

Steffens²,

Steffens³

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard

The objective of this study was to identify the critical success factors (CSFs) that predict, in a specific niche, the dairy sector in Brazil and later monitor their behaviors behavior when applied together with the project management activity, along with a case study where the extrapolation of the implementation of wastewater treatment by the combined membrane system was carried out. In order to develop the case, the hypothetical-deductive method was adopted and later the content analysis was carried out through the Sphinx Lexical (qualitative analysis) computer system, data clusters and quantitative data validation was performed with SPSS Statistic, allowing to understand CSF of classification. In applying this methodology, after grouping factors in the company, one can verify the existence of implicit relationships of the FCSs, impacting mainly on the organizational aspects, especially related to the effective communication and the need for managerial support in the decision making as the most representative and factors related to risk planning and analysis. As for the explicit impact of the factors with the organization, one can verify the predominance of cost factors, and the possibility of reusing water.

show abstract

Section: %mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Model with Critical Factors of Success, Predominant in Implementation of a Membrane System in the Wastewater Treatment—Review of the Case Study of a Dairy Industry

Faitão¹,

Steffens²,

Steffens³

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard

show abstract

“…There are many risks inherent in this more open, dynamic system. Supply chains involve many risks (Olson and Wu, ). Cucchiella and Gastaldi () divided supply chain risks into categories of internal (involving such issues as capacity variations, regulations, information delays, and organizational factors) and external (market prices, actions of competitors, manufacturing yield and costs, supplier quality, and political issues).…”

Section: Supply Chain Risk Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Olson and Wu (, ) presented five cases where multiple criteria were used in supply chain decisions. These cases were usually applied to evaluate alternative suppliers, either relatively as sources of various types of risk, or in a selection decision.…”

Section: Supply Chain Decisions and Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Trade-offs in Supply Chain System Risk Mitigation

Olson

Swenseth

2014

Syst. Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard

Supply chains are critical to global operations. However, they involve many risks that require consideration of trade‐offs. Furthermore, consideration of the environment is becoming critical as well. This paper views supply chain decision‐making from a system perspective, using multiple criteria decision‐making as a framework. Systems perspectives of supply chains are discussed. Criteria and factors are reviewed for green supply chain management, supply chain risk, and supply chain efficiency. Selected papers balancing criteria in supply chain decision‐making are reviewed with the purpose of demonstrating risk and environmental criteria with efficiency. The conclusions discuss how systemic features are demonstrated by these decision‐making criteria. It is contended that consideration of systemic trade‐offs will lead to sounder supply chain decision‐making. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

Enterprise Risk Management in Supply Chains

Cited by 2 publications

References 29 publications

Development of a Model with Critical Factors of Success, Predominant in Implementation of a Membrane System in the Wastewater Treatment—Review of the Case Study of a Dairy Industry

Development of a Model with Critical Factors of Success, Predominant in Implementation of a Membrane System in the Wastewater Treatment—Review of the Case Study of a Dairy Industry

Trade-offs in Supply Chain System Risk Mitigation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About