2023
DOI: 10.1109/tcss.2022.3154442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble Hybrid Learning Methods for Automated Depression Detection

Abstract: Changes in human lifestyle have led to an increase in the number of people suffering from depression over the past century. Although in recent years, rates of diagnosing mental illness have improved, many cases remain undetected. Automated detection methods can help identify depressed or individuals at risk. An understanding of depression detection requires effective feature representation and analysis of language use. In this article, text classifiers are trained for depression detection. The key objective is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approaches proposed in this work and the state-of-the-art approach used the same REDDIT to train and evaluate the suggested models. Kumar et al [8] 2019 100 users 1 (depression) 3 ML models Acc= 85% Tarik et al [9] 2019 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 2 DL models Acc= 74% Hussain et al [10] 2019 Not mentioned 2 (depression & anxiety) 3 ML models F1-score= 0.84 Wong et al [11] 2019 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 2 DL models -Rezaii et al [12] 2019 40 users 1 (depression) 2 NLP techniques Acc= 90% Inkpen et al [13] 2019 Not mentioned 2 (depression and PTSD) 1 DL model Acc= 88% Thorstad et al [6] 2019 All REDDIT 4 (all mental disorders) 1 ML model F1-score= 0.77 Trifan et al [14] 2020 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 3 ML models F1-score= 0.72 Jiang et al [15] 2020 Not mentioned 4 (all mental disorders) 1 DL model F1-score= 0.64 Alghamdi et al [16] 2020 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 6 ML models Acc= 80% Birnbaum et al [17] 2020 223 users 1 (depression) 2 ML models Acc= 77% Chatterjee et al [18] 2021 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 1 ML models Acc= 76% Ren et al [19] 2021 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 1 DL models Acc= 91% Shaoxiong et al [20] 2022 All REDDIT 1 (depression) 2 EL models Acc= 75% Nalini. L [21] 2022 Not mentioned Not mentioned 3 ML models Not mentioned Tufail [22] 2023 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 1 DL model Acc= 64% Koushik et al [23] 2023 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 1 ML & 2 DL Acc= 60% Yicheng et al [25] 2023 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 1 Time series approach -Helmy et al [27] 2024 70,000 tweets 1 (depression) 5 ML models Acc=92% Dhariwal [28] 2024 Small healthcare dataset The proposed work aims at the early detection and even the prediction of potential future mental disorder from social media data.…”
Section: ) Language Models Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approaches proposed in this work and the state-of-the-art approach used the same REDDIT to train and evaluate the suggested models. Kumar et al [8] 2019 100 users 1 (depression) 3 ML models Acc= 85% Tarik et al [9] 2019 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 2 DL models Acc= 74% Hussain et al [10] 2019 Not mentioned 2 (depression & anxiety) 3 ML models F1-score= 0.84 Wong et al [11] 2019 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 2 DL models -Rezaii et al [12] 2019 40 users 1 (depression) 2 NLP techniques Acc= 90% Inkpen et al [13] 2019 Not mentioned 2 (depression and PTSD) 1 DL model Acc= 88% Thorstad et al [6] 2019 All REDDIT 4 (all mental disorders) 1 ML model F1-score= 0.77 Trifan et al [14] 2020 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 3 ML models F1-score= 0.72 Jiang et al [15] 2020 Not mentioned 4 (all mental disorders) 1 DL model F1-score= 0.64 Alghamdi et al [16] 2020 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 6 ML models Acc= 80% Birnbaum et al [17] 2020 223 users 1 (depression) 2 ML models Acc= 77% Chatterjee et al [18] 2021 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 1 ML models Acc= 76% Ren et al [19] 2021 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 1 DL models Acc= 91% Shaoxiong et al [20] 2022 All REDDIT 1 (depression) 2 EL models Acc= 75% Nalini. L [21] 2022 Not mentioned Not mentioned 3 ML models Not mentioned Tufail [22] 2023 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 1 DL model Acc= 64% Koushik et al [23] 2023 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 1 ML & 2 DL Acc= 60% Yicheng et al [25] 2023 Not mentioned 1 (depression) 1 Time series approach -Helmy et al [27] 2024 70,000 tweets 1 (depression) 5 ML models Acc=92% Dhariwal [28] 2024 Small healthcare dataset The proposed work aims at the early detection and even the prediction of potential future mental disorder from social media data.…”
Section: ) Language Models Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, in 2022 Shaoxiong et al [20] trained many classifiers on text to detect depression. The study mainly focused on the comparison between hybrid and ensemble methods in automatic depression detection from social media posts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this table we see a heavy reliance on text data. Recently, we observe a trend away from hand-crafted features towards complex neural word embedding models such as those seen in [ 59 , 58 , 62 ]. This mirrors a pattern seen in the data science field in general with powerful text embedding models becoming the current state of the art.…”
Section: Informatics Paradigms and The Diagnosis And Detection Of Dep...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, 'Sushant Singh Rajput' attempted suicide due to depression [1]. The goal of this system is to create a hybrid modal system [9] that will help society and medical professionals diagnose and track depression. This study utilized ensemble learning to learn from PHQ8 data in order to get the correct positive results [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%