2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enoxaparin Anticoagulation Monitoring in the Catheterization Laboratory Using a New Bedside Test

Abstract: Hemonox CT appears to be a fast and reliable bedside test for detecting patients insufficiently anticoagulated and needing adjustment of anticoagulation therapy with enoxaparin before PCI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While significant variability in sensitivity between different coagulation methods (clot-based, chromogenic, and point-of-care) have been reported [3,27,28] significant differences often arise even when the method of testing is identical but the manufacturer of the test kit differs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While significant variability in sensitivity between different coagulation methods (clot-based, chromogenic, and point-of-care) have been reported [3,27,28] significant differences often arise even when the method of testing is identical but the manufacturer of the test kit differs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Another study used Hemonox-CT to identify patients with an insufficient anti-Xa activity level (Ͻ0.5 U/mL) among 296 patients undergoing PCI. 59 Hemonox-CT, aPTT, and chromogenic anti-Xa activity levels were measured at baseline and 10 minutes after IV administration of enoxaparin. A Hemonox-CT threshold value of 120 seconds was associated with 94% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 74% positive predictive value, and 95% negative predictive value.…”
Section: Act and Lmwhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are a group of anticoagulant drugs that are used in the treatment of venous thrombosis, cardiovascular disease, thrombotic and ischaemic stroke worldwide [1,2]. A significant advantage of LMWHs over unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the fact that monitoring in the large majority of patients is not essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the standard coagulation monitoring assays such as the activated partial thromboplastin time test (APTT) or the activated clotting time test (ACT) are not sufficiently discriminatory for monitoring LMWHs, suffer from inter-laboratory variability and are lacking in standardization [2,7,8]. LMWHs exert their anticoagulant effect via interaction with the pentasaccharide-binding domain on antithrombin (AT), which in turn enhances the inhibitory effect of AT on factor Xa (FXa) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%