2006
DOI: 10.1007/11744047_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the Point Feature Tracker by Adaptive Modelling of the Feature Support

Abstract: Abstract. We consider the problem of tracking a given set of point features over large sequences of image frames. A classic procedure for monitoring the tracking quality consists in requiring that the current features nicely warp towards their reference appearances. The procedure recommends focusing on features projected from planar 3D patches (planar features), by enforcing a conservative threshold on the residual of the difference between the warped current feature and the reference. However, in some importa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The descriptor is calculated in every frame using the current frame information and the information from previous frames. Tracking can be achieved either by detection, or by using a standard tracker such as meanshift or KLT [17]. The algorithm for descriptor calculation assumes that a bounding box around the object of interest is available in every frame.…”
Section: Building the Spatio-temporal Appearance Descriptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descriptor is calculated in every frame using the current frame information and the information from previous frames. Tracking can be achieved either by detection, or by using a standard tracker such as meanshift or KLT [17]. The algorithm for descriptor calculation assumes that a bounding box around the object of interest is available in every frame.…”
Section: Building the Spatio-temporal Appearance Descriptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both components rely on a multi-scale differential tracker with warp correction and checking towards the reference appearance [19]. The employed warp includes isotropic scaling and affine contrast compensation [18]. The output of the framework is a set of 2D vectors connecting the current features with their corresponding locations in the next key-image.…”
Section: Scalable Mapping and Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above is similar to visual odometry [14], except that we employ larger feature windows and more involved tracking in order to achieve more distinctive features and longer feature lifetimes. To ensure a minimum number of features within an arc of the graph, a new node is forced when the absolute number of tracked points falls below n. Bad tracks are identified by a threshold R on RMS residual between the current feature and the reference appearance [19,18]. Typically, the following values were used: σ = 4, n = 50, R = 6.…”
Section: The Mapping Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bad tracks are identified by a threshold R on RMS residual between the warped current feature and the reference appearance. The employed warp includes isotropic scaling and affine contrast compensation [18]. The two-view geometry is recovered in a calibrated context by random sampling, with the five-point algorithm [19] as the hypothesis generator.…”
Section: Scalable Mapping and Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the current frame is discarded, while the previous frame is registered as the new node of the graph, and the whole procedure is repeated from there. This is similar to visual odometry [20], except that we employ larger feature windows and more involved tracking [18] in order to achieve more distinctive features and longer feature lifetimes. To ensure a minimum number of features within an arc of the graph, a new node is forced when the absolute number of tracked points falls below n.…”
Section: The Mapping Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%