2021
DOI: 10.1002/smr.2363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing agile software development in the banking sector—A comprehensive case study at LHV

Abstract: FinTech companies are challenging established financial institutions' dominance by offering the same products with a superior customer experience and delivering new features faster. The adoption of agile software development partially enables this competitive advantage. In response to this challenge, banks explore how they can improve their agile processes. LHV, a mid-sized bank, uses agile practices but faces the challenge of further improvement to stay competitive with FinTech companies.In this article, we e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,10,29,[33][34][35] By considering opinions of multiple stakeholders, our approach fits well with agile SDM that emphasize team autonomy, decentralized decision making, flexible scope, and managing a high degree of requirement changes. 36,37 Detailed insight into SDM and its elements can be gained by comparing the perceptions of different stakeholders regarding the same SDM and/or its element. 9 Another important theoretical development in the field was that SDM should be studied at the level of its constituent elements like activities, tools, roles, and produced documents and not only as a whole.…”
Section: Sdm Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,10,29,[33][34][35] By considering opinions of multiple stakeholders, our approach fits well with agile SDM that emphasize team autonomy, decentralized decision making, flexible scope, and managing a high degree of requirement changes. 36,37 Detailed insight into SDM and its elements can be gained by comparing the perceptions of different stakeholders regarding the same SDM and/or its element. 9 Another important theoretical development in the field was that SDM should be studied at the level of its constituent elements like activities, tools, roles, and produced documents and not only as a whole.…”
Section: Sdm Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain information about the studied SDM and its elements, the aforementioned studies focused on SDM perceptions held by different stakeholders, namely, developers, managers, and customers to measure characteristics like level of use, assimilation, social and technical suitability, developer satisfaction, and impact on performance 7,10,29,33–35 . By considering opinions of multiple stakeholders, our approach fits well with agile SDM that emphasize team autonomy, decentralized decision making, flexible scope, and managing a high degree of requirement changes 36,37 …”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other contributions present case studies on the digital transformation of a particular bank (e.g. Birkinshaw 2019; Christou et al 2010;Roses et al 2016;Scott et al 2021). As the existing research does not pursue a sector-specific perspective, our study of the German banking sector complements the existing empirical research on agile methods in software development processes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%