2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2018.8377197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we continue by comparing our proposed beamforming training scheme relying on a beneficial frame structure to the most pertinent contributions in TableI . The majority of the existing literature has aimed for achieving low-latency beam training using either formal or heuristic optimization Some abbreviations in Table I are [18] P2P EBS-EBS [19] P2P PS-PS [20], [21] P2P PS-PS [22] P2P EBS-PS [23], [24] P2MP EBS-EBS [25] P2MP EBS-EBS [26] P2MP EBS-EBS [27] P2MP EBS-PS [28] P2MP PS-PS [29], [30] MP2MP…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, we continue by comparing our proposed beamforming training scheme relying on a beneficial frame structure to the most pertinent contributions in TableI . The majority of the existing literature has aimed for achieving low-latency beam training using either formal or heuristic optimization Some abbreviations in Table I are [18] P2P EBS-EBS [19] P2P PS-PS [20], [21] P2P PS-PS [22] P2P EBS-PS [23], [24] P2MP EBS-EBS [25] P2MP EBS-EBS [26] P2MP EBS-EBS [27] P2MP EBS-PS [28] P2MP PS-PS [29], [30] MP2MP…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [26] improved the contention mechanism by redesigning the backoff methods used for avoiding repeated packet collisions, albeit at the cost of introducing potentially excessive training overheads. Although the authors of [27], [28] have addressed the above-mentioned problems, they adopted a rigid fixed framing structure without considering the beam alignment outage probability. A further limitation of the existing studies is the consideration of a single access point (AP), which has limited performance in terms of serving a limited number of users.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%