2010
DOI: 10.1080/09541440903427487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced memory for emotional pictures: A product of increased attention to affective stimuli?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive stimuli, whether delivered under a constant or intermittent schedule during learning, had no effect on parahippocampal activation relative to neutral stimuli, although arousal levels were matched independently for positive and negative stimuli. Similar to previous studies that have shown memory enhancement for negative emotional stimuli (Schwarze et al, 2012;Keightley, Chiew, Anderson, & Grady, 2011;Humphreys, Underwood, & Chapman, 2010;Mickley Steinmetz, Addis, & Kensinger, 2010;Mickley & Kensinger, 2008), our finding suggests that affectively modulated place memory is valence-specific. Our findings are also consistent with previous studies that have shown that the parahippocampal gyrus is specifically involved in the processing of negative emotional stimuli but not positive emotional stimuli (Aldhafeeri, Mackenzie, Kay, Alghamdi, & Sluming, 2012;Gosselin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Positive stimuli, whether delivered under a constant or intermittent schedule during learning, had no effect on parahippocampal activation relative to neutral stimuli, although arousal levels were matched independently for positive and negative stimuli. Similar to previous studies that have shown memory enhancement for negative emotional stimuli (Schwarze et al, 2012;Keightley, Chiew, Anderson, & Grady, 2011;Humphreys, Underwood, & Chapman, 2010;Mickley Steinmetz, Addis, & Kensinger, 2010;Mickley & Kensinger, 2008), our finding suggests that affectively modulated place memory is valence-specific. Our findings are also consistent with previous studies that have shown that the parahippocampal gyrus is specifically involved in the processing of negative emotional stimuli but not positive emotional stimuli (Aldhafeeri, Mackenzie, Kay, Alghamdi, & Sluming, 2012;Gosselin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Conversely, other studies (e.g. Humphreys, Underwood, & Chapman, 2010;Ochsner, 2000) found that unpleasant pictures were more likely to be recollected than pleasant and neutral ones. On the other hand, exactly how memory strength alters RTs is unclear, as dissenting findings have suggested that "familiarity" can produce longer RTs, based on the notion that "remember" judgements may be more rapid than "know" judgments (Dewhurst, Holmes, Brandt, & Dean, 2006;Wixted, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…One study used stimuli from the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW; e.g., Chan & Singhal, 2013), while twelve studies used the International Affective Picture System (IAPS; e.g.,Chapman et al, 2012; Humphreys et al, 2010; Koenig & Mecklinger, 2008; Riggs et al, 2011; Talmi & MacGarry, 2012; Talmi et al, 2007; Talmi et al, 2008; Zhang et al, 2015). Three studies used emotionally valenced faces (e.g., Clemens et al, 2015; Mather & Carstensen, 2003; Srinivasan & Gupta, 2010), while one study used images and emotional narratives (Chang & Choi, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies (Humphreys et al, 2010; Kim et al, 2013) presented pairs of images (e.g., neutral-negative, neutral-neutral, positive-negative, and positive-neutral) to participants at encoding. Twelve experiments used emotional scenes, involving a central negative or neutral item with a neutral or negative peripheral background image, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation