2010
DOI: 10.1080/14498596.2010.487850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced evaluation of image segmentation results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
66
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…An empirical discrepancy method [31,45], which uses manually identified regions as reference objects, was adopted to quantitatively assess segmentation quality. First, clearly separable areas were manually segmented as the reference objects.…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An empirical discrepancy method [31,45], which uses manually identified regions as reference objects, was adopted to quantitatively assess segmentation quality. First, clearly separable areas were manually segmented as the reference objects.…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, scale as a threshold for MC often leads to similarly sized segments [22], but the real world is more complicated and contains objects with a large variation in size. Partitioning the image into segments similar in size may simultaneously cause over-segmentation and under-segmentation at a specific scale [31]. The solution to this problem, as offered by the multi-scale approach, is to segment images into differently scaled segmented layers that are linked by an object relation tree; this technique is known as the Fractal Net Evaluation Approach (FNEA) [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead we will focus on approaches that have achieved demonstrated success in remote sensing land categorization applications. A compilation of such approaches can be found in a series of papers published by a research group based at the Leibniz Institute for Ecological and Regional Development (IOER) that present comparative evaluations of image segmentation approaches implemented in various image analysis packages (Meinel and Neubert, 2004), (Neubert, et al, 2006), (Neubert, et al, 2008), (Marpu, et al, 2010). The next several sections describe various spatially-based image segmentation approaches, starting with region growing algorithms, and continuing with texture-based algorithms, morphological algorithms, graph-based algorithms, and MRF-based algorithms.…”
Section: Spatially-based Segmentation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors state that the quality of segmentation process directly affects the resulting classification accuracy (Kim et al, 2009;Marpu et al, 2010). It can be stated that similarity of created objects with the selected scale parameter(s) to real-world objects is of considerable importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%