“…In comparison to the European context, EMI studies in Asian countries are much fewer. The current literature tends to be framed, most often implicitly, within Kachru's (1976) Three Circles model of world Englishes by limiting the research scope to: (1) potential challenges or deficiencies with regards the English language proficiency of non‐native English instructors in the EMI programmes situated in Expanding Circle countries (that is, non‐English‐speaking and not being previous colonies of English‐speaking countries like Great Britain) (Hu & Lei, 2014); (2) the role of L1 and code‐switching practices of non‐native English‐speaking instructors in EMI classrooms (An & Chiang, 2015; Gu & Lee, 2018; Kim, Choi, & Tatar, 2017); (3) comparisons between EMI and CMI (Chinese‐medium instruction) policies and curricula (Zhang, 2018; Zhao & Dixon, 2017); and (4) the likeliness of EMI programmes to empower students with the accumulation of relevant symbolic and cultural capital and enhancing competitiveness in the global human resource market (Gu & Lee, 2018; Hu, 2008, 2009). A few studies have also investigated EMI practices and intercultural sensitivity of local/international students as influenced by their perceptions of the EMI policy, whereas the notion of culture is discussed as a nation‐bound entity characterized by essentialist features (An & Chiang, 2015).…”