2017
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b08347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering of Pore Geometry for Ultrahigh Capacity Methane Storage in Mesoporous Metal–Organic Frameworks

Abstract: Mesoporous ZnO(-COO)-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), including UMCM-1, MOF-205, MUF-7a, and the newly synthesized MOFs, termed ST-1, ST-2, ST-3, and ST-4 (ST = ShanghaiTech University), have been systematically investigated for ultrahigh capacity methane storage. Exceptionally, ST-2 was found to have the highest deliverable capacity of 289 cm/cm (567 mg/g) at 298 K and 5-200 bar, which surpasses all previously reported records held by porous materials. We illustrate that the fine-tuned mesoporosity is c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multicomponent MOFs have emerging applications in catalysis, luminescence and gas storage . In order to form multicomponent MOFs judicious selection of the linkers is essential (Figure , Scheme S1) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multicomponent MOFs have emerging applications in catalysis, luminescence and gas storage . In order to form multicomponent MOFs judicious selection of the linkers is essential (Figure , Scheme S1) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure c, FDM‐8 delivered a total volumetric capacity of 215 cm 3 stp cm −3 at 80 bar and 298 K. This total volumetric capacity increased to 257 cm 3 stp cm −3 at 80 bar when the measurement was conducted at 273 K. The corresponding uptake value was 204 cm 3 stp cm −3 at 308 K. The near‐zero‐coverage isosteric heat of adsorption ( Q st ) was calculated to be 10.4 kJ mol −1 based on the isotherms at various temperatures (see Figures S39 and S42 and Table S6), which is comparable to the values of most carboxylate and azolate MOFs, but lower than those of copper(I)‐based MOFs with open metal sites . The Q st value slightly increased at high pressure, probably owing to CH 4 –CH 4 interactions at high gas loading . Considering the retention of a minimum inlet pressure of 5 bar, the methane volumetric capacity above this pressure, termed the working capacity, is more meaningful in practical operation settings .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…As ar esult, 3D_ICOF_5 is the most likely configuration in ICOFs,w hich is in line with the energy calculation of the ICOFs. To evaluate the CH 4 adsorption capacity on 3D_ ICOFs, the comparison of the CH 4 uptakes with several porous classical materials (including COF-5, [3] ZIF-8, [52] UMCM-1, [53] IRMOF-1, [54] ST-2 [55] ), as well as two ionic materials [5,20] is displayed in Figure 7. We choose the COF-5, ZIF-8, UMCM-1, IRMOF-1, and ST-2 for comparison because they are wellknown classic porous materials with excellent gas adsorption/ separation properties, and are often used as benchmarks.…”
Section: Gas Uptakes In 3d_icofsmentioning
confidence: 99%