2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2015.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering flat electronic bands in quasiperiodic and fractal loop geometries

Abstract: Exact construction of one electron eigenstates with flat, non-dispersive bands, and localized over clusters of various sizes is reported for a class of quasi-one-dimensional looped networks. Quasiperiodic Fibonacci and Berker fractal geometries are embedded in the arms of the loop threaded by a uniform magnetic flux. We work out an analytical scheme to unravel the localized single particle states pinned at various atomic sites or over clusters of them. The magnetic field is varied to control, in a subtle way, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2017 Ramachandran et al [39] introduced the most general flat band generator for bipartite lattices with chiral flat bands, where the first example (to our knowledge) of a chiral flat band in a three-dimensional network was obtained. Other novel approaches for obtaining flat band lattices involve origami rules [42], the repetition of oligomers [43], local symmetries [44], and self-similar (fractal) constructions [45,46].…”
Section: A Different Flat Band Classes and Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017 Ramachandran et al [39] introduced the most general flat band generator for bipartite lattices with chiral flat bands, where the first example (to our knowledge) of a chiral flat band in a three-dimensional network was obtained. Other novel approaches for obtaining flat band lattices involve origami rules [42], the repetition of oligomers [43], local symmetries [44], and self-similar (fractal) constructions [45,46].…”
Section: A Different Flat Band Classes and Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FBs have been studied in a number of lattice models in threedimensional, two-dimensional, and even one-dimensional (1D) settings [7][8][9], and recently realized experimentally with photonic waveguide arrays [10-12], excitonpolariton condensates [13,14], and ultra-cold atomic condensates [15].FB networks rely on the existence of compact localized eigenstates (CLS) due to destructive interference, enabled by the local symmetries of the network. FB networks are constructed using graph theory [7,[16][17][18][19], CLS [7,20,21], and can be perturbed e.g. by disorder to arrive at unexected new scaling laws [21,22], and correlated potentials to arrive at diverging densitites of states, gaps, and designable mobility edges [23,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FB networks rely on the existence of compact localized eigenstates (CLS) due to destructive interference, enabled by the local symmetries of the network. FB networks are constructed using graph theory [7,[16][17][18][19], CLS [7,20,21], and can be perturbed e.g. by disorder to arrive at unexected new scaling laws [21,22], and correlated potentials to arrive at diverging densitites of states, gaps, and designable mobility edges [23,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact calculations on hierarchical lattices are also currently widely used in a variety of statistical mechanics [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], finance [37], and, most recently, DNA-binding [38] problems.…”
Section: Renormalization-group Method: Migdal-kadanoff Approximamentioning
confidence: 99%