2016
DOI: 10.1109/mele.2016.2584938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Is On Board: Energy Storage and Other Alternatives in Modern Light Railways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A mathematical approach for implementing multi-rate analysis in railroad traction systems by means of heterogeneous multi-scale approaches is presented in [6]. Arboleya et al [7] suggests that on-board accumulation is the best option for energy recovery in a safe way in light railroad systems from the point of view of investment cost and flexibility. An approach based on a backward/forward sweep technique for solving power flows in weakly meshed DC traction systems is presented in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mathematical approach for implementing multi-rate analysis in railroad traction systems by means of heterogeneous multi-scale approaches is presented in [6]. Arboleya et al [7] suggests that on-board accumulation is the best option for energy recovery in a safe way in light railroad systems from the point of view of investment cost and flexibility. An approach based on a backward/forward sweep technique for solving power flows in weakly meshed DC traction systems is presented in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective solution to the above issues is the implementation of an energy storage system (ESS) on urban transportation networks for braking energy recovery purposes [2]. Another feasible solution is the direct installation of an ESS on LR vehicles that can meet the requirements of traction applications and serve as power supplies [3][4][5][6]. An onboard ESS for LR vehicles has the following advantages: First, urban transportation areas can be extended to catenary-free zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, it allows a flexible and simpler infrastructure. Finally, the energy recovery of an onboard ESS, compared to its competitors, has greater flexibility and lower investment costs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, since the existing supply facility and the regenerative solution are at the same location, there is just a small change in the amount of current flowing through the catenary, and it is difficult to significantly improve the catenary losses. In the case of on-board application, since it is possible for it to handle the regenerative energy by itself in the train, it can maximize the use of regenerative energy and reduce the catenary loss significantly with the lowered load current flowing through the catenary [19,20]. However, the increase in the driving mass due to the on-board mounted storage may increase the driving energy itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%