2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11036-011-0336-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Efficient and Scalable Routing Protocol for Extreme Emergency Ad Hoc Communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors compared four different opportunistic routing protocols for emergency scenarios such as Epidemic, MaxProp, Probabilistic Routing Protocol using History of Encounters and Transitivity (PRoPHET), and Time To Return (TTR), but these forwarding methods do not consider the energy for long emergency situations with a high density of nodes or many messages. The hybrid protocol Chameleon (CML), which uses two protocols-AODV and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR)-was presented in [35][36][37] by Ramrekha, et al It aims to adapt to the change in the topology according to the behavior of nodes in a disaster. Ramrekha, et al in [38] presented the performance of AODV and OLSR in an emergency situation inside a building, and showed that OLSR proactive behavior is better than AODV reactive behavior for networks with low density.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors compared four different opportunistic routing protocols for emergency scenarios such as Epidemic, MaxProp, Probabilistic Routing Protocol using History of Encounters and Transitivity (PRoPHET), and Time To Return (TTR), but these forwarding methods do not consider the energy for long emergency situations with a high density of nodes or many messages. The hybrid protocol Chameleon (CML), which uses two protocols-AODV and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR)-was presented in [35][36][37] by Ramrekha, et al It aims to adapt to the change in the topology according to the behavior of nodes in a disaster. Ramrekha, et al in [38] presented the performance of AODV and OLSR in an emergency situation inside a building, and showed that OLSR proactive behavior is better than AODV reactive behavior for networks with low density.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A flexible energy-efficient (E2) mechanism for emergency ad hoc communications is proposed in [21]. It provides a balanced usage of node residual energy and reduces the failure degree of a node.…”
Section: Routing Protocols Based On Node Energy Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of current routing protocols, proposed in MANET group of IETF [2], consider the path length metric when choosing the best route between a source ( ) and a destination node ( ). However, this approach may, in most cases, minimize the end-to-end delay in a communication between the source and the destination node, but it may not be adept to handle other QoS metrics such as energy efficiency and load balancing, because they do not consider the node residual energy as a criterion in the route selection process [15].…”
Section: Power-aware Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%