2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-017-0893-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-efficient and QoS-aware model based resource consolidation in cloud data centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al in their previous study have proposed a model to balance energy consumption and QoS in data centers. For this purpose, a utility function is defined, and the goal is to minimize this function.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al in their previous study have proposed a model to balance energy consumption and QoS in data centers. For this purpose, a utility function is defined, and the goal is to minimize this function.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to [26], Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) based algorithm was proposed by Li et al [27] for VMs consolidation that also utilizes static thresholds for detecting under-utilization and over-utilization hosts. Another PSO based VM consolidation model is proposed by Li et al [28]. The proposed model incorporates Euclidean distance of resource and degree of user satisfaction along with traditional energy consumption and quality of service related traits.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic consolidation helps in optimizing resource utilization in the cloud data center [29]. Meta-heuristic based methods [22]- [28] have occasionally shown better results, but they tend to slow down the optimization processes with the exceeding number of VMs involved as the search space grows quite significantly. Some works [25]- [27] tried to limit the number of VMs for reducing search space by taking a static value of threshold of utilization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[61] classified the server resources based on resource ranking, while [63] scheduled the VMs based on the availability of the server resources where they achieved an optimal number of migrations. On the reliability side, the VM overhead has optimized as in [67], [73], [78], [79]. In [81] the network traffic was optimized by auto-scaling that integrates both application auto-scaling and dynamic VM allocation when they reduced the communication latency among VM2VM.…”
Section: ) Migration Overheadmentioning
confidence: 99%