Avian Energetics and Nutritional Ecology 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0425-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetics and Nutrition of Molt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
175
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 208 publications
5
175
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if the metabolic costs of producing a feather were relatively low (Ankney, 1984;Murphy and King, 1986;Buttemer et al, 2003;Hoye and Buttemer, 2011), the total amount of energy required during the molting period is expected to be increased because of a combination of protein requirements for feather synthesis and increased costs of flying (Murphy and King, 1992;Lindström et al, 1993;Murphy and Taruscio, 1995;Schieltz and Murphy, 1995;Murphy, 1996;Swaddle and Witter, 1997;Fox et al, 2008;Strochlic and Romero, 2008). Indeed, even though zebra finches in our study reduced feather growth rate quite dramatically and slightly reduced aspects of molt intensity during the overlap, they also increased their feeding rate by as much as 80% and lowered preening by approximately 70% compared with individuals that only molted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the metabolic costs of producing a feather were relatively low (Ankney, 1984;Murphy and King, 1986;Buttemer et al, 2003;Hoye and Buttemer, 2011), the total amount of energy required during the molting period is expected to be increased because of a combination of protein requirements for feather synthesis and increased costs of flying (Murphy and King, 1992;Lindström et al, 1993;Murphy and Taruscio, 1995;Schieltz and Murphy, 1995;Murphy, 1996;Swaddle and Witter, 1997;Fox et al, 2008;Strochlic and Romero, 2008). Indeed, even though zebra finches in our study reduced feather growth rate quite dramatically and slightly reduced aspects of molt intensity during the overlap, they also increased their feeding rate by as much as 80% and lowered preening by approximately 70% compared with individuals that only molted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rubolini et al, 2002;Echeverry-Galvis and Hau, 2013;Saino et al, 2014). Energy is required for feather keratin and pigment synthesis, for buffering the temporary loss of insulation during body feather replacement, and (in the case of flight feather moult) to compensate for the reduced foraging efficiency due to impaired mobility (Murphy, 1996). Moreover, incorporation of melanin pigments into feathers requires lowered circulating GSH levels (Galván and Alonso-Alvarez, 2008).…”
Section: Moult Oxidative Status and Sex Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both females had started moulting and were replacing primaries 1 -3, but retained all of their old rectrices. Overlap of moult with caring for a brood must impose a considerable energetic stress on these adults that may reduce their survival (Murphy, 1996;Hemborg and Lundberg, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%