2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic ultrasound: impact on survival in patients with esophageal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With an accuracy of around 86% (60–90%), EUS has become the most widely accepted modality in evaluating the T‐stage of esophageal cancer . EUS accuracy increases with depth of invasion and has less overall accuracy for T1 lesions .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With an accuracy of around 86% (60–90%), EUS has become the most widely accepted modality in evaluating the T‐stage of esophageal cancer . EUS accuracy increases with depth of invasion and has less overall accuracy for T1 lesions .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with T1 (invasion up to but not beyond the submucosa) and T2 (up to the muscularis propria) lesions typically undergo up front endoscopic or surgical resection while those with deeper invasion (≥T3, up to or beyond the adventitia) usually receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by surgical resection if appropriate. EUS provides good loco‐regional staging information . However, EUS requires expertise, is not universally available, and can be associated with adverse events …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mere introduction of an EUS-based pretherapeutic imaging strategy was found to improve the overall survival of esophageal cancer patients compared with a CT-based imaging strategy [22,23]. Others have failed to verify this [24], and the poor outcome in cases of advanced disease, regardless of treatment, may be an important factor in the discussion [17,25]. The patients in this study were treated based on the findings of EUS-LUS, and although no adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy had been provided, the survival data after R0 resection were comparable with the data in the literature (Table 2).…”
Section: Impact Of Eus-lus On Survivalmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A transthoracic three-field lymphadenectomy carries considerable morbidity and since node positive disease has such a poor prognosis, considerable efforts are now made to exclude local extension and node involvement with endoluminal ultrasound [17,18] and more distant disease with a CT-PET scan [19]. The transhiatal operation has much the same long-term outcome and since this approach carries less morbidity than the transthoracic operation this may have some advantage [20].…”
Section: Esophageal Carcinoma In 1985 Was the Ninth Most Common Maligmentioning
confidence: 99%