2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-matched study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although technically simple, safe, and effective for weight loss, sleeve gastrectomy is associated with increased health care utilization costs secondary to multiple known serious adverse events (SAEs), and increased prevalence of worsened or de novo GERD with unknown associated long-term risks of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. 1 Given these limitations, particularly in patients with lower body mass index (between 30 to 40 kg/m 2 ), endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an attractive minimally invasive endoscopic alternative to surgery that expands the therapeutic benefits of effective obesity interventions targeting the GI tract to patients who do not qualify for or wish to pursue bariatric surgery. 2 In the largest series of patients undergoing ESG to date, Alqahtani et al 3 add to a growing body of literature that suggests ESG is ready for prime time in the evolving management paradigm of obesity and metabolic disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although technically simple, safe, and effective for weight loss, sleeve gastrectomy is associated with increased health care utilization costs secondary to multiple known serious adverse events (SAEs), and increased prevalence of worsened or de novo GERD with unknown associated long-term risks of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. 1 Given these limitations, particularly in patients with lower body mass index (between 30 to 40 kg/m 2 ), endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an attractive minimally invasive endoscopic alternative to surgery that expands the therapeutic benefits of effective obesity interventions targeting the GI tract to patients who do not qualify for or wish to pursue bariatric surgery. 2 In the largest series of patients undergoing ESG to date, Alqahtani et al 3 add to a growing body of literature that suggests ESG is ready for prime time in the evolving management paradigm of obesity and metabolic disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall mean %TBWL at 12 months of the 121 patients that were treated in our center is in accordance with other studies (Table 1). 2,3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] As in all endoscopic procedures, ESG is repeatable per definition and the need to perform a redo ESG should not be considered as a failure of the previous procedure, but in selected patients it can be contemplated as a second-step endoscopic treatment approach. Indications for redo ESG are the same as for the first procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] The reported mean percentage of total body weight loss (%TBWL) is 17.2% at 12 months and 20.2% at 24 months, on average (Table 1). 2,3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] If weight resumption after surgery is considered a real failure of the technique, the need to perform a redo ESG in selected patients should not be considered as a failure of the previous procedure. ESG is repeatable per definition, likewise for every endoscopic procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESG is now rapidly affirming as an effective alternative to LSG and there is initial evidence that it may be safer than LSG and effective in improving DM2, hypertension, reflux disease and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome 28,29 . In the largest series described so far, including 1000 patients, ESG was well tolerated and effective in inducing significant weight loss without mortality or significant morbidity at 18‐month follow‐up 30 …”
Section: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplastymentioning
confidence: 99%