endoscopic endonasal posterior clinoidectomy TO THE EDITOR: We read with interest the article by Fernandez-Miranda et al. 1 regarding a new technique for performing endoscopic endonasal posterior clinoidectomy (Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Rastelli MM Jr, et al: Endoscopic endonasal transcavernous posterior clinoidectomy with interdural pituitary transposition. Technical note. J Neurosurg 121:91-99, July 2014).The authors described an innovative surgical technique performed through the cavernous sinus, with an interdural dissection taking advantage of the natural corridor provided by the separation of the inner and outer dural layers at the lateral margin of the sellae. This corridor provides access to the posterior clinoid process, making the endoscopic endonasal posterior clinoidectomy a safe and effective procedure. The approach was performed in 12 patients (6 with chordomas, 5 with petroclival meningiomas, and 1 with an epidermoid tumor), with great clinical results and no permanent hypopituitarism, diabetes insipidus, or neurovascular injuries. The impeccable quality of the anatomical dissections together with the detailed description of the surgical approach helps the reader to understand the complex anatomy of this region seen from the endoscopic endonasal view. The authors are to be congratulated on the excellent quality of the study and the clinical results.In contrast to the Pittsburgh group's experience, we have described a purely extradural posterior clinoidectomy. 2 We have performed this approach safely in dozens of patients and have formed the opinion that in the majority of cases a purely extradural approach is sufficient to achieve an adequate posterior clinoidectomy. In those cases in which the extradural approach is not sufficient we have used the interdural approach, as described expertly in this article. Hence, we use the interdural approach more selectively, as needed, and it is possible to convert easily from the extradural to the interdural approach. Overall, it is our opinion that an extradural approach is safer because the dura mater can serve as a natural protector against neurovascular injury. There is also the option of working both above and below the pituitary gland to reach the interpeduncular fossa and retroinfundibular area, thereby avoiding damage to the pituitary gland and its blood supply. 3 Making an analogy to the transcranial anterior clinoidectomy, which can be performed intra-or extradurally, there are probably indications for both inter-and extradural posterior clinoidectomy. Ultimately, the idea is to avoid a complete pituitary transposition, which often causes hypopituitarism.Modern skull base neurosurgery is based on tailoring the approach for each patient. Thus, the new technique described by the authors is an important addition to skull base surgery, but in our opinion should be reserved for those posterior clinoids that cannot be removed extradurally, rather than being the default operation in all cases.