2013
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3182646ab8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscope-Assisted Versus Open Repair of Craniosynostosis

Abstract: Issues with the endoscope-assisted procedure primarily concerned the postoperative helmet regimen, specifically patient compliance (17.1% noncompliance rate) and minor skin breakdown (5.7%). The endoscope-assisted repair with postoperative helmet molding therapy is a cost-effective procedure with less operative risk and minimal postoperative morbidity. This is a valuable treatment option in younger patients with compliant caregivers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall costs for ESC averaged only 42% of the costs of traditional cranial vault reconstruction, whereas the early clinical results showed no difference. [25] Similar results were also reported elsewhere [26,27].…”
Section: Closed Repair: Minimally Invasive Endoscopic-assisted Strip supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The overall costs for ESC averaged only 42% of the costs of traditional cranial vault reconstruction, whereas the early clinical results showed no difference. [25] Similar results were also reported elsewhere [26,27].…”
Section: Closed Repair: Minimally Invasive Endoscopic-assisted Strip supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The use of endoscope-assisted techniques with post-operative helmeting has been advantageous in the appropriately selected infants as it allows for a decrease in operative time and blood loss. In contrast, more traditional open techniques such as cranial vault remodeling are more invasive, have increased morbidity, and may require longer hospitalizations [1,7,9,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscope-assisted suturectomy and post-operative helmet orthosis in newborns less than 3 months of age has become an increasingly widespread and favorable technique for surgical correction of single suture synostosis [2,4,5,[10][11][12]16]. This minimally invasive approach, compared to more traditional surgical techniques for craniosynostosis, such as cranial vault remodeling, relies on rapid brain growth of the newborn in addition to helmet therapy to slowly correct asymmetric head shape while allowing for decreased blood loss, anesthesia time, and hospital length of stay [7,13,14]. As endoscopic synostosis surgery becomes more widespread, iterations of improvement have led to increased precision, efficiency, and safety [3,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Compared with the traditional approach, minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy has been reported to result in less blood loss and shorter hospital stay, and it can be performed in individuals at an earlier age. 7 The technique, however, requires helmet therapy for up to 1 year postoperatively to complete morphological correction of the calvarial vault and delay the maximal correction of shape for prolonged periods (up to 1 year).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%