2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endometrial compaction does not predict the reproductive outcome after vitrified–warmed embryo transfer: a prospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
5
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with Jin et al, Kaye showed that the CPR was higher in EC group [14]. In accordance with our study, Olgan determined that CPR did not differ between EC and noncompaction groups [15]. In the past, a fair number of studies concentrated upon the endometrial lining thickness rather than EC [16,17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast with Jin et al, Kaye showed that the CPR was higher in EC group [14]. In accordance with our study, Olgan determined that CPR did not differ between EC and noncompaction groups [15]. In the past, a fair number of studies concentrated upon the endometrial lining thickness rather than EC [16,17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The effect of endometrial thickness on the reproductive outcome is apparent (19). The interaction between the receptive endometrium and the embryo is a complicated molecular process that results in effective implantation (20). When the level of P4 reaches a critical threshold, it drives an orderly and timely secretory transformation of the endometrium, leading to receptivity (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was supported by Youngster, M., et al [ 141 ] in a retrospective observational study. However, several recent studies, including HRT cycles alone [ 142 , 143 ] or in combination with modified natural cycle (mNC) [ 144 146 ], failed to link endometrial compaction of ≥ 5% with pregnancy rates or live birth rates (LBRs). To avoid errors introduced by ultrasound measurement, EMT in these studies [ 142 , 143 ] was assessed via both transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) and AUS in all patients on the day of embryo transfer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several recent studies, including HRT cycles alone [ 142 , 143 ] or in combination with modified natural cycle (mNC) [ 144 146 ], failed to link endometrial compaction of ≥ 5% with pregnancy rates or live birth rates (LBRs). To avoid errors introduced by ultrasound measurement, EMT in these studies [ 142 , 143 ] was assessed via both transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) and AUS in all patients on the day of embryo transfer. Furthermore, estrogen and progesterone concentrations were accessed to investigate hormonal reasons behind this event, and no connection with endometrial compaction was discovered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%