2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-7714.2011.00065.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Onwards and upwards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For tariff‐based health care systems, it is crucial that EBUS‐TBNA tariffs recognise this innovation. In the UK until recent times, there was no specific EBUS‐TBNA tariff, so that EBUS‐TBNA received a standard flexible bronchoscopy tariff despite the increased cost, complexity and time of the procedure (50,51). Coding errors remain commonplace and also contribute to revenue loss (43,52,53).…”
Section: Cost Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tariff‐based health care systems, it is crucial that EBUS‐TBNA tariffs recognise this innovation. In the UK until recent times, there was no specific EBUS‐TBNA tariff, so that EBUS‐TBNA received a standard flexible bronchoscopy tariff despite the increased cost, complexity and time of the procedure (50,51). Coding errors remain commonplace and also contribute to revenue loss (43,52,53).…”
Section: Cost Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBUS requires extra training beyond conventional bronchoscopy. The price and running costs is still higher than mediastinoscopies [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, it is imperative that the tariffs are updated in line with innovation—for example, in the UK there is no specific EBUS-TBNA tariff which is not sufficiently distinguished from a standard flexible bronchoscopy tariff despite the increased cost, complexity and time of EBUS-TBNA 65 66. Secondly, correct procedure coding remains pivotal as exemplified by studies and reports showing significant rates of coding error in the UK health care system 67–69…”
Section: Financial Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%