2021
DOI: 10.1177/00187208211064371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encumbered and Traditional Anthropometry of Law Enforcement Officers for Vehicle Workspace and Protective Equipment Design

Abstract: Objectives This study investigated anthropometric changes of national law enforcement officers (LEOs) in 46 years, compared the differences between LEO data and civilian anthropometry, and identified the magnitude of differences in dimensions measured with gear versus semi-nude measurements. Background The best available 46-year-old anthropometric dataset of LEOs has largely become outdated due to demographic changes. Additionally, anthropometric data of female LEOs and LEO measurements with gear are lacking. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon arrival to a national LEO anthropometry study site (Hsiao et al, 2021b), each officer was given a consent form to read, which described the study. Each participant had the opportunity to ask questions before signing an informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Upon arrival to a national LEO anthropometry study site (Hsiao et al, 2021b), each officer was given a consent form to read, which described the study. Each participant had the opportunity to ask questions before signing an informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After completing the body measurements, Figure 2. LEOs are in general heavier than the general population and have a larger upper torso build: an average male LEO (a) comparing to an average male civilian (b) and an average female LEO (c) comparing to an average female civilian (d) as reported by Hsiao et al, (2021b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations