2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2004.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encephalopathy associated with influenza A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many patients with influenza virus-associated encephalopathy (IE) have been reported in Japan [7][8][9], and recently, some cases have been reported in Europe and the United States [10,11]. Pathological findings revealed that viral antigens and inflammatory cells were undetectable in brain tissues and suggest that direct viral invasion does not induce IE [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many patients with influenza virus-associated encephalopathy (IE) have been reported in Japan [7][8][9], and recently, some cases have been reported in Europe and the United States [10,11]. Pathological findings revealed that viral antigens and inflammatory cells were undetectable in brain tissues and suggest that direct viral invasion does not induce IE [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Lethal pneumonia and encephalopathy caused by influenza virus have now become a serious problem, especially among the elderly and children, respectively [1,2]. Furthermore, the H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus associated with a high fatality rate (greater than 60%) has been reported in Southeast Asia, Europe and Africa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical findings and outcome differed substantially from recent Dutch cases with IAE (Smidt et al, 2004;van Zeijl et al, 2005). Although fatal cases of IAE occurred in Japan, fatal cases of IAE have not been documented in The Netherlands after the 1957 pandemic, when 68 patients (mainly children) died during a 3-month period (van Geer and Mulder, 1958).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%