2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enamel bonding of single-step self-etch adhesives: Influence of surface energy characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
69
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The factors that influence the wetting of a solid by a liquid include the relative surface free energy of the former and the surface tension of the latter. To achieve optimal wettability, the surface free energy of the solid (γS) must be maximized, and the liquid should exhibit a lower contact angle to the solid [21][22][23] . The surface tension component γS LW can be obtained by solving the complete Young equation 27) , and is due to three distinct interactions: randomly oriented permanent dipole-permanent dipole (orientation) interactions; randomly oriented permanent dipoleinduced dipole (induction) interactions; and fluctuating dipole-induced dipole (dispersion) interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The factors that influence the wetting of a solid by a liquid include the relative surface free energy of the former and the surface tension of the latter. To achieve optimal wettability, the surface free energy of the solid (γS) must be maximized, and the liquid should exhibit a lower contact angle to the solid [21][22][23] . The surface tension component γS LW can be obtained by solving the complete Young equation 27) , and is due to three distinct interactions: randomly oriented permanent dipole-permanent dipole (orientation) interactions; randomly oriented permanent dipoleinduced dipole (induction) interactions; and fluctuating dipole-induced dipole (dispersion) interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface free energies were determined by measuring the contact angle on the surface for three test liquids, distilled water, 1-bromonaphthalen, and ethylene glycol, each of which has known surface free-energy parameters ( Table 3). The Drop Master DM500 apparatus (Kyowa Interface Science, Saitama, Japan) was fitted with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, which allowed automatic measurements of the contact angles to be taken 23) . For each test liquid, the equilibrium contact angle (Ө) was measured using the sessile-drop method at 23±1°C for five specimens of each adhesive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). For each test liquid, the equilibrium contact angle (θ) was measured, using the sessile-drop method at 23±1°C, for five specimens of each adhesive 15) . The surface free-energy parameters of the solids were then determined based on the fundamental concepts of wetting.…”
Section: Surface-free Energy Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, many surfaces had γs d values that were close to 40 mN/m 27) , and other studies attributed these values to adsorption of a socalled "atmospheric contamination layer" 28) , particularly on chemically and/or mechanically activated surfaces 29) . Hence, the presence of this atmospheric layer may explain similarities of γs d values between the present treatment groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%