Enabling PROFINET devices to work in IoT: Characterization and requirements

Bellagente, Paolo; Ferrari, Paolo; Flammini, A.; Rinaldi, Stefano; Sisinni, Emiliano

doi:10.1109/i2mtc.2016.7520417

Cited by 43 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Internet of Things (IoT) and smart objects are finding applications in very different domains, ranging from healthcare to industry [1]- [3]. Cloud based solutions are paving the way to innovative services [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the evaluation of LoRaWAN virtual channels orthogonality for dense distributed systems

Ferrari

Flammini

Rizzi

et al. 2017

2017 IEEE International Workshop on Measurement and Networking (M&N)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Internet of Things (IoT) aims at collecting data from billions of devices connected altogether. Despite there is no one technology able to cope with all possible scenarios, LPWAN solutions are emerging as viable technologies for implementing private, low-cost cellular like wireless networks. Distributed systems could leverage this approach as a driving technology for services as smart environment sensing, pervasive sensing and so on. In the considered scenario, the capacity of the network is of main importance; even if communication is sporadic for most of the time, an event observed by many nodes results in a huge amount of simultaneous transmissions. Are the IoT technologies usable to this end? In this paper LoRaWAN technology is investigated, with the aim of evaluating the orthogonality of virtual channels permitted by the LoRa physical layer. In particular, measurements demonstrated that overlapping transmissions having the same power at the receiver can be correctly decoded if occurring with different spreading factors, whereas co-spread messages require at least 4ms spacing.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the evaluation of LoRaWAN virtual channels orthogonality for dense distributed systems

Ferrari

Flammini

Rizzi

et al. 2017

2017 IEEE International Workshop on Measurement and Networking (M&N)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The OPC Server interprets the data received from PLC or HMI and OPC Client requests data from the server for processing. The protocol PROFINET is the communication standard used in the industrial field, owing to the high-speed transmission/reception of data, which ensures the high quality of IIoT technology [13,20] (Fig. 14.6).…”

Section: Protocols Of Communicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Data Transfer from PLC to Cloud Platforms-Based Real-Time Monitoring Using the Industrial Internet of Things

Chuquimarca

Asencio

Torres

et al. 2021

Information and Knowledge in Internet of Things

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The publish/subscribe model is one of the most popular paradigms in the Industry 4.0 environment [14]- [17], which is the reference scenario in this article. In the publisher-subscriber model, there are two kinds of stations: 1) the subscribers, which are interested in receiving the information, may subscribe to the topic of interest and then wait for new messages to come; and 2) the publishers, which wish to send information, may publish a message identified by a topic [18]. The publishing and the message distribution to subscribers may be done through a specific server, also called a broker [19], or by using some services offered by the transport layer (e.g.…”

Section: The Publish/subscribe General Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the performance of OPC UA and MQTT for data exchange between industrial plants and cloud servers

Rocha¹,

Sestito²,

Dias³

et al. 2019

ACTA IMEKO

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a key technology in the development of Industry 4.0. An increasing number of new industrial devices are expected to communicate with each other by means of local (edge) and cloud computing servers. In this article, two well-known protocols used for IoT and Industrial IoT (IIoT) are compared in terms of their performance when they are used to send/receive data to/from cloud servers. Due to their wide diffusion and suitability, the considered protocols are open platform communication-unified architecture publisher-subscriber (OPC UA PubSub) (purposely developed and maintained by industrial consortia) and message queuing telemetry transport (MQTT), the most well-known message protocol originally developed by IBM. The performance comparison is carried out considering the overall quantity of the data transferred (user payload plus overhead) and the roundtrip time required to send in data and receive a feedback message in return. The experimental results include the evaluation of several cloud computing server and application scenarios, highlighting how each protocol is particularly suitable for certain situations. Finally, conclusions about the best choice for data exchange between devices are given.

show abstract

Enabling PROFINET devices to work in IoT: Characterization and requirements

Cited by 43 publications

References 12 publications

On the evaluation of LoRaWAN virtual channels orthogonality for dense distributed systems

On the evaluation of LoRaWAN virtual channels orthogonality for dense distributed systems

Evaluation of Data Transfer from PLC to Cloud Platforms-Based Real-Time Monitoring Using the Industrial Internet of Things

On the performance of OPC UA and MQTT for data exchange between industrial plants and cloud servers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About