Empowering the powerful: Challenging hidden processes of marginalization in youth work policy and practice in Belgium

Abstract

On the basis of extensive research, we turn a critical eye on often unnoticed processes of marginalization at play in current youth work policy and practice in Flanders (the Dutch speaking part of Belgium). Although the historical situation seems different from that in the UK, current policies show similar results: vulnerable youth is increasingly monitored into particular target categories and separated into distinct and professionalized youth work initiatives. Inspired by critical class theory, we raise the veil of youth work as a hidden civilization strategy that empowers the yet powerful and has served the often unconscious agenda of enforcing social control on vulnerable youth to create order in late capitalist societies. The perspective of the critical social theorist Hermann Giesecke who perceives youth work as ` politische Bildung' (a process of political socialization) allows us to explore strategies for inclusion which can be implemented to energize future youth work praxis.

Social Exclusion and Austerity Policies in England: The Role of Sports in a New Area of Social Polarisation and Inequality?

“…Secondly, new models of funding and a payment-byresults accountability risk introducing new incentives, as Kelly (2012, p. 114) put it, that "focus on less challenging (potential) participants and prioritize short-term interventions over long-term relationship building". What is more, research has illustrated how youth programs pursuing fixed externally defined outcomes potentially have the perverse effect of excluding those who differ most from a desired developmental trajectory or pro-gram endpoint (Coussée, Roets, & De Bie, 2009;Tiffany, 2011). This is especially relevant if such a trajectory or endpoint is conceptualized based on mainstream conventions and practices regarding education, employment or positive youth development, conventions and practices that are perpetuated by the same institutions (for example, schools and career services) that make young people vulnerable in the first place (Haudenhuyse, Theeboom, & Nols, 2013).…”

Exploring young people's and youth workers' experiences of spaces for ‘youth development’: creating cultures of participation

“…Internationally, over the last ten years (Coussée et al 2009), the practices of youth work, and the social spaces in which it takes place, have fallen deeply out of fashion with policy makers. Research that has positioned traditional youth work as largely 'unstructured' and disorganised (Feinstein et al 2006;Mahoney et al 2004), has fed into policy making in England resulting in the provision of more instrumental forms of working with young people that focused on structured, positive activities (HM…”

Assembling the Irreconcilable: Youth Workers, Development Policies and ‘High Risk’ Boys in the Netherlands

“…Different authors argue that the 'positive youth development' philosophy, and the neoliberal ideas framing it, actually makes it more difficult for youth workers to use more 'radical' methods in which goals remain vague, relationships are crucial and young people are more in charge and empowered (Coussée et al 2009;Sukarieh & Tannock 2011;Nolas 2014). They also point to the fact that young people are constructed as a stereotypical group onto which simplistic expectations are projected, positive and negative: either they are seen as problematic and dangerous or they are framed as resourceful and capable of changing their neighbourhood or even society as a whole (e.g.…”

“…Even though youth work also aims at the empowerment of young people, it also plays an important role in the reproduction of power relations. Local policy makers and youth workers may strive to stay in touch with vulnerable youth in order to prevent social unrest, a goal that may be in the public interest but does not necessarily advance the empowerment of these youths (Coussée et al 2009).…”