DURING the past few decades, a great interest in medical mycology lias developed throughout the world. Studies of epidemiology, ecology and taxonomy have occurred so rapidly that the whole subject has become infinitely more interesting and more alive. Some of the most interesting of these recent developments concern the dermatophytes, the fungi which cause ringworm and allied infections in man and animals, and which have been known to medical science for more than 100 years. The name tinea-a Latin word meaning a moth or a worm-^has been used as a generic name for ringworm since the fourteenth century, derived, as Ainsworth (1951) observes, from a fanciful resemblance of the disease to the depredations of the clothes moth. This resemblance may have been fanciful in the first place, but it is now known to have some relation to fact, for the ringworm fungi and the clothes moth both produce keratinase, an enzyme which attacks and destroys keratin. In this paper is described some recent work on the dermatophytes and other keratinophilic fungi.In spite of the monumental work of Sabouraud (1910), the nomenclature of the dermatophytes remained in a state of confusion until Emmons (1934) proposed that their identification should be based on biological rather than clinical criteria. Microsporum had been described by Gruby (1843) and Trichophyton by Malmsten (1845). Since that time hundreds of species of dermatophytes had been described by medical men on the basis of trivial cultural differences, of the type of lesion produced or even the part of the body affected. This was done without any appreciation of the pleomorphic nature of these fungi, their variation in growth on different media and the variations in resistance of the host. Emmons (1934) in a masterly study succeeded in clearing away a lot of this confusion, and his classification is almost universally used today, at any rate by the Englishspeaking world. In the near future there will no doubt be changes in nomenclature because of the recent discovery of the perfect states of some of these fungi.A very interesting development in the history of the dermatophytes began when Emmons (1951) and, independently of him, Vanbreuseghem and Van Brussel (1952) pointed to the soil as a reservoir of pathogenic fungi. It is now well recognized that the ringworm fungi, like many of the fungi causing deep mycoses, are not obligatory human pathogens but lead an independent existence in the soil and probably play an important part in the breakdown of hair, fur, feathers and other keratinaceous debris. But in 1951 this was an entirely new idea. There had been only two earlier reports of a dermatophyte growing as a saprophyte under natural conditions, one by Muende and Webb (1937) and the other by Mandels (1948). Following the work: of Emmons and of Yanbreuseghem,