2009
DOI: 10.3182/20090909-4-jp-2010.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emplacement and Blue Print – An Approach to Handle and Describe Modules for Evolvable Assembly Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These both get close to objectives of the work reported in this paper, having the main difference on harmonisation of capabilities, not having abstraction layer present and encapsulation of resource's Intellectual Properties and implementation. This paper is refining and extending the earlier work reported in [15][16][17] and summarizes the core models from [18].…”
Section: Existing Production Resource Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These both get close to objectives of the work reported in this paper, having the main difference on harmonisation of capabilities, not having abstraction layer present and encapsulation of resource's Intellectual Properties and implementation. This paper is refining and extending the earlier work reported in [15][16][17] and summarizes the core models from [18].…”
Section: Existing Production Resource Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…virtual representation) and the control of the implemented assembly system. One possible concept used is the Emplacement concept [20] with the Emplacement and Blue Print file formats [21]. The concept is aimed to be generic and it is valid and usable for different system implementations at a wide range of domains including also the meso/micro assembly and manufacturing.…”
Section: ) Suitability Of Eps Concept For Meso/micromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the active EPS research community has extensively studied different aspects of such domain which, in turn has spread in different directions through a large amount of heterogeneous contributions: research requirements [10], design support tools and models [11,12], business processes [5,13,14], diagnostic [15,16], system deployment and description [17,18], system configuration [19], self-learning mechanisms [20], self-organization theory [21] and management of complexity [22] among the others. Most of the research efforts that shaped the EPS paradigm at the early stage have been carried out within the large collaborative European project EUPASS [23] while the more recent developments have been attained within the following European project IDEAS [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%