Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: Theory and evidence

Bernasconi, Michele; Choirat, Christine; Seri, Raffaello

doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.014

Cited by 63 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Shen, Muduli, and Barve () employed AHP to evaluate the priorities of green supply chain management criteria existing in the current literature for mining companies. Bernasconi, Choirat, and Seri () also discussed the aggregation of individual judgments of different decision makers and identified five main classes of aggregation procedures for AHP method. Radivojevic and Gajovic () proposed an approach for supply chain risk modeling.…”

Section: Principles Of Ahp and Fuzzy Promethee Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selecting Occupational Safety Equipment by MCDM Approach Considering Universal Design Principles

Kaya

Dağdeviren

2015

Hum Ftrs & Erg Mfg Svc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Occupational safety concept, which has become a major subject in all industries, has a vital importance in preventing accidents and ensuring a safe working environment. This study proposes an integrated approach to evaluate occupational safety equipment by considering universal design (UD) and technical requirements, both separately and simultaneously. UD principles are concerned with making things usable for anyone, whatever their conditions may be, without any requirements for rearrangement. Two robust multicriteria decision making (MCDM) aid methods, AHP and fuzzy PROMETHEE, are employed to handle the evaluation process in the presented study. The study also includes a demonstration of the proposed approach on a real MCDM problem. The study findings indicate that the proposed approach is valid and accurate, and the inclusion of UD principles has a positive and comprehensive effect on the selection process. C 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

show abstract

Section: Principles Of Ahp and Fuzzy Promethee Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selecting Occupational Safety Equipment by MCDM Approach Considering Universal Design Principles

Kaya

Dağdeviren

2015

Hum Ftrs & Erg Mfg Svc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…AHP is a multiple criteria decision-making tool that often used [7]. AHP method is one of Decision Support System methods which are comprehensive and rational to provide a solution to the problem of complex criteria in a variety of alternatives to calculate qualitative and quantitative matters [8].…”

Section: It Priority Troubleshooting Using Analytical Hierarchymentioning

confidence: 99%

IT priority troubleshooting using analytical hierarchy process method (case study at the Indonesian Railways Co)

Utomo¹,

Palupi²

2017

AIP Conference Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) escalation data of IT disruption report in the Indonesian Railways Co is divided into some criteria such as disaster, crisis, critical, major, and minor. Each criterion consists of several sub-criteria. The disruption in the sub-criteria may come up together at the same time. However, the SOP does not have a priority troubleshooting to solve it. The research aims to decide the troubleshooting priority of IT disruption in the Indonesian Railways Co using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). AHP calculation starts with the pairwise comparisons of critical, major and minor criteria. The result of AHP consistency is measured based on the Consistency Ration (CR) value. The decision results of CR IT priority troubleshooting are; critical 0.094, major 0.076, and minor 0.051, with overall CR ≤ 0.1. The AHP method got the optimal IT priority troubleshooting. This priority order can be used for assisting the determination of priority troubleshooting if there is a lot of simultaneous disruption.

show abstract

“…According to a recent study [17], in these cases, the differences between vectors are often negligible.…”

Section: Ammentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Brunelli¹

2015

SpringerBriefs in Operations Research

303

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: Theory and evidence

Cited by 63 publications

References 45 publications

Selecting Occupational Safety Equipment by MCDM Approach Considering Universal Design Principles

Selecting Occupational Safety Equipment by MCDM Approach Considering Universal Design Principles

IT priority troubleshooting using analytical hierarchy process method (case study at the Indonesian Railways Co)

Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About