2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional responses to sweet foods according to sweet liker status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
40
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
9
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To better understand reasons for these conflicting reports, a critical consideration is the classification methods used to identify distinct sweet-liking patterns (i.e., sweet-liking phenotypes). Research in the UK [44,45], the US [31], and Korea [46] have all found evidence that liking for sweet taste can be separated into three distinct and definable phenotypes: those expressing strong liking to high levels of sweetness (sweet likers; SLs), those who have aversive responses to strong sweet tastes (sweet dislikers; SDs), and a third group exhibiting maximum liking for a moderate concentration of sucrose [47]. Prior to this emerging consensus, there was a major lack of agreement in criteria used to identify these patterns of hedonic responses across studies [47], leading to an overly simplistic dichotic classification (SLs versus SDs) which failed to adequately describe the full range of human behavioural responses to sweetness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better understand reasons for these conflicting reports, a critical consideration is the classification methods used to identify distinct sweet-liking patterns (i.e., sweet-liking phenotypes). Research in the UK [44,45], the US [31], and Korea [46] have all found evidence that liking for sweet taste can be separated into three distinct and definable phenotypes: those expressing strong liking to high levels of sweetness (sweet likers; SLs), those who have aversive responses to strong sweet tastes (sweet dislikers; SDs), and a third group exhibiting maximum liking for a moderate concentration of sucrose [47]. Prior to this emerging consensus, there was a major lack of agreement in criteria used to identify these patterns of hedonic responses across studies [47], leading to an overly simplistic dichotic classification (SLs versus SDs) which failed to adequately describe the full range of human behavioural responses to sweetness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different methodological approaches for classification of participants, unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) has gained recent attention as a tool due to its potential for unbiased cluster discovery 38,43,44 . The application of HCA to "liking" responses to sucrose concentrations ranging up to 1M has generated likers, dislikers, and inverted U groups 38 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A longitudinal study showed that perimenopausal women were 2.5 times more likely to be depressed than non-perimenopausal women (Easterlin, 2003). Women in perimenopausal period may have craving for sweet taste, which may contribute to serotonergic, dopaminergic secretion through different physiological mechanisms (Kim et al, 2017). Moreover, individuals who prefer sweetened beverages might be unaware of the harmful on physical health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%