Emission allocation issues in repositioning transportation

Abstract

Various emission reduction methods have been investigated in relation to policy, technology, and operation in academia and industry. Increasing capacity utilization by sharing transportation network and gaining return cargo is one potential approach to achieve this reduction. As a consequence, repositioning of the vehicle is needed in some cases, which needs to be supported by a proper emission allocation scheme to encourage different players to form and maintain a sharing coalition. However, the presence of repositioning adds a level of complexity to the emission allocation issue since empty trips in repositioning transportation carry no cargo themselves to which the emissions can be allocated. For this purpose, we present alternative allocation schemes and investigate the impacts of these schemes on the carbon footprint measurement. A real-life case study is demonstrated and discussed based on a simulation model and analysis of variance (ANOVA). We find that different schemes have significant effects on the distribution of emission among the cargo owners. We suggest that a scheme to share the emissions based on total transport work is preferable because it provides motivation for a joint cooperation between players and improves the environmental performance. The methodology applied in this article can be generalized to other repositioning transport cases in which more players and more logistics legs including empty trips are involved. It also provides insight for policymakers to devise rules for carbon footprint calculations that encourage collaboration and shared transport in complex, multi-stakeholder transportation networks.

Evolution of green shipping research: themes and methods

“…For example, the method of a bottom-up activity-based approach has been widely applied in module 1 to calculate air emissions (e.g., Farrell et al, 2003, Song andXu 2012). The methods of mathematical and statistical analyses, economic modeling, scenario and mathematical model, and case study have been widely applied in module 2 to discuss different kinds of measures taken to reduce emissions (e.g., Kim, Rahimi and Newell 2012, Kontovas and Psaraftis 2011, Rodrigues et al, 2015, Zhu, Nowak and Erikstad 2016, Venturini et al, 2017. The methodologies of DEA and AHP have been applied in module 3 to evaluate the efficiency of green policy and green port (e.g., Cui, 2017, Sun et al, 2017, Asgari et al, 2015.…”

Exploring shippers' motivations to adopt collaborative truck-sharing initiatives

“…Increasing the utilization of vehicles also has benefits in terms of, for example, the reduction of conventional air pollutants (Zhu et al , 2016). For this reason, the truck-sharing idea provides shippers and their customers with an energy-saving solution for “green” shipping.…”

Fair gain allocation in eco-efficient vendor-managed inventory cooperation

“…There are some gain allocation studies that conclude that logistics cooperation results in cost savings as well as environmental benefits (Frisk et al, 2010, Jonkman et al, 2018. Other recent studies have started to use gain allocation methods to allocation CO 2 emissions to cooperating partners (Kellner and Otto, 2012, Naber et al, 2015, Zhu et al, 2016. Some authors include CO 2 emissions as part of the cost function, on which they apply different allocation methods ( Özener, 2014, Niknamfar and Niaki, 2016, Sanchez et al, 2016.…”