1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)00486-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency vaccination of sheep against foot-and-mouth disease: protection against disease and reduction in contact transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption that infectious and viraemic periods coincide in time is common in studies of the course of FMD infection (e.g. Gibson & Donaldson 1986;Cox et al 1999) and is employed here for reasons of model parsimony and to avoid problems of parameter identifiability. The use of a more complicated model to account for a possible time delay between the onset (or end) of infectiousness and viraemia would be problematic for inference purposes under the restricted information in the available data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption that infectious and viraemic periods coincide in time is common in studies of the course of FMD infection (e.g. Gibson & Donaldson 1986;Cox et al 1999) and is employed here for reasons of model parsimony and to avoid problems of parameter identifiability. The use of a more complicated model to account for a possible time delay between the onset (or end) of infectiousness and viraemia would be problematic for inference purposes under the restricted information in the available data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike conventional FMD vaccines, however, emergency vaccines are often of higher potency (≥ 6 protective dose 50 (PD50)) to ensure both rapid protective immunity and greater cross-specificity. The high potency is usually the result of increasing the antigen load per dose and there is good documentary evidence that such emergency vaccines, as either an oil or aqueous formulation, confer rapid and protective immunity in the appropriate target species within 4 days of vaccination [61,74,209]. Additionally, such vaccines also appear to be able to reduce local virus replication in the oropharynx thereby limiting the transmission of disease to other susceptible animals [61,209].…”
Section: "Emergency" Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high potency is usually the result of increasing the antigen load per dose and there is good documentary evidence that such emergency vaccines, as either an oil or aqueous formulation, confer rapid and protective immunity in the appropriate target species within 4 days of vaccination [61,74,209]. Additionally, such vaccines also appear to be able to reduce local virus replication in the oropharynx thereby limiting the transmission of disease to other susceptible animals [61,209]. More recently, studies using an oil-based high potency vaccine in sheep [16] have shown that after only a single vaccination, the antibody levels can be maintained for a significantly longer period of time than normally observed with a conventional formulation.…”
Section: "Emergency" Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercially available single water-in-oil (W/O) adjuvants, Montanide ISA 25 and ISA 50, and double water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) adjuvants, ISA 206, without the addition of saponin, elicited protective humoral immune responses against European FMD serotypes in cattle (Barnett, Pullen, Williams & Doel 1996;Iyer, Ghosh, Singh & Deshmuhk 2001), sheep (Barnett, Keel, Reid, Armstrong, Statham, Voyce, Aggarwal & Cox 2004;Cox, Barnett, Dani & Salt 1999;Patil, Bayra, Ramakrishna, Hugar, Misra, Prabhudas & Natarajan 2002b), goats (Patil, Bayra, Ramakrishna, Hugar, Misra & Natarajan 2002a) and pigs (Barnett et al 1996;Barnett, Cox, Aggarwal, Gerber & McCullough 2002;Barnett & Carabin 2002). The W/O adjuvants induced faster and better protective immune responses than the W/O/W adjuvants (Barnett et al 1996;Iyer et al 2001), while the addition of saponin to the W/O FMD vaccine enhanced the antibody titres especially at lower payloads (Smitsaart, Mattion, Filippi, Robiolo, Periolo, La Torre & Bellinzoni 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%