1990
DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(90)90298-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency cardiopulmonary bypass for resuscitation from prolonged cardiac arrest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
62
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
62
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Three keynotes to treatment include recognizing the role of CPB to overcome myocardial stunning after prolonged CA with CPR-ALS [4], using transient hyperkalemia on CBP to convert intractable VF, and insights into improving brain recovery. Studies show that less than 10 minutes of experimental CA followed by normothermic CPB results in almost complete myocardial and neurologic recovery [7,8]. Conversely, after 15 minutes of CA, negligible (approximately 15%) survival has been reported with CPR-ALS alone [7,10,12], and this finding is consistent with the 19% survival reported in our model.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Three keynotes to treatment include recognizing the role of CPB to overcome myocardial stunning after prolonged CA with CPR-ALS [4], using transient hyperkalemia on CBP to convert intractable VF, and insights into improving brain recovery. Studies show that less than 10 minutes of experimental CA followed by normothermic CPB results in almost complete myocardial and neurologic recovery [7,8]. Conversely, after 15 minutes of CA, negligible (approximately 15%) survival has been reported with CPR-ALS alone [7,10,12], and this finding is consistent with the 19% survival reported in our model.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Studies show that less than 10 minutes of experimental CA followed by normothermic CPB results in almost complete myocardial and neurologic recovery [7,8]. Conversely, after 15 minutes of CA, negligible (approximately 15%) survival has been reported with CPR-ALS alone [7,10,12], and this finding is consistent with the 19% survival reported in our model. Although CPB allowed 64% survival after unsuccessful CPR-ALS, it failed to prevent impaired neurologic recovery and thus agrees with previous CPB reports [7, 10 -12].…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An opportunity for a breakthrough in resuscitation is use of extracorporeal support (E-CPR) for reperfusion, given that it can be used to optimize extra-cerebral physiology while also allowing immediate temperature control and administration of therapies that might not otherwise be tolerated [263][264][265][266]. Technical challenges to E-CPR are considerable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%