2012
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2012.929.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embryogenic Capacity of Embryo-Derived Explants From Different Olive Cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, plantlet survival during acclimatization should be improved [13]. Developing efficient regeneration systems through somatic embryogenesis or organogenesis will undoubtedly contribute to the propagation, genetic improvement and preservation of argan, as was the case in other oil crops [20][21][22][23]. Recently, a regeneration system has been established for argan through organogenesis [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, plantlet survival during acclimatization should be improved [13]. Developing efficient regeneration systems through somatic embryogenesis or organogenesis will undoubtedly contribute to the propagation, genetic improvement and preservation of argan, as was the case in other oil crops [20][21][22][23]. Recently, a regeneration system has been established for argan through organogenesis [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When zygotic explants were used, the results showed that the embryogenesis capacity was significantly different between the two cultivars, confirming the difference in the embryogenic competence according to juvenile plant material of the cultivars. According to multiple authors, somatic embryogenesis depends on the genotype and, therefore, on the cultivar [ 14 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. However, it has been reported that many olive cultivars are recalcitrant to in vitro culture and, especially, to the induction of somatic embryogenesis, while others respond perfectly to this regeneration process and with a higher embryogenic potential [ 14 , 35 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to multiple authors, somatic embryogenesis depends on the genotype and, therefore, on the cultivar [ 14 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. However, it has been reported that many olive cultivars are recalcitrant to in vitro culture and, especially, to the induction of somatic embryogenesis, while others respond perfectly to this regeneration process and with a higher embryogenic potential [ 14 , 35 , 39 ]. For many plants, genotype-dependent somatic embryogenesis is related to the accumulation of some transcripts such as CmAGL11 (affecting the expression of several genes related to the gibberellin, auxin, and ethylene pathways) [ 41 ] or to chemical compounds and proteins, including antioxidants [ 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 53.3 and 56.7 % of calli induced on OMc containing respectively IAA or IBA continue to proliferate better with production of nodules (Figure 1C) while 76.7 and 86.7 % of calli obtained respectively on OMc and MS containing 2,4-D showed a high browning with a low callogenesis (6 to 10 %) close to the control allowing 6.7 % of proliferation (Table 1). Mazri et al (2012) noted that olive calli in the absence of cytokinin and reduced concentrations of auxins turn brown quickly due to a high accumulation of phenolic compounds reducing cell growth (Trabelsi et al, 2011). Nevertheless, calli produced in the presence of NAA were slightly browned (16 to 30 %) but with a significant loss of their proliferation capacity.…”
Section: Induction Of Embryogenic Callimentioning
confidence: 99%