2007
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2007.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elicitation of expert knowledge to develop decision support tools for use in water demand management planning

Abstract: This paper examines the use of influence diagrams (IDs) in water demand management (WDM) strategy planning with the specific objective of exploring how IDs can be used in developing computer-based decision support tools (DSTs) to complement and support existing WDM decision processes. We report the results of an expert consultation carried out in collaboration with water industry specialists in Sofia, Bulgaria. The elicited information is presented as influence diagrams and the discussion looks at their useful… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The investigation of each of the mitigation options, listed in Table 3 has been thoroughly described in other papers and is beyond the scope of the current paper (Dimova et al 2007, Inman et al 2007, Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia et al 2007, Inman et al 2008, Ribarova et al 2008, VamvakeridouLyroudia et al 2009, Wintgens et al 2009). Only some of the aspects of their participatory content will be underlined in what follows.…”
Section: Outlines Of the Feasibility Studies On The Mitigation Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation of each of the mitigation options, listed in Table 3 has been thoroughly described in other papers and is beyond the scope of the current paper (Dimova et al 2007, Inman et al 2007, Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia et al 2007, Inman et al 2008, Ribarova et al 2008, VamvakeridouLyroudia et al 2009, Wintgens et al 2009). Only some of the aspects of their participatory content will be underlined in what follows.…”
Section: Outlines Of the Feasibility Studies On The Mitigation Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%