2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514272112
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eleventh-century shift in timber procurement areas for the great houses of Chaco Canyon

Abstract: An enduring mystery from the great houses of Chaco Canyon is the origin of more than 240,000 construction timbers. We evaluate probable timber procurement areas for seven great houses by applying tree-ring width-based sourcing to a set of 170 timbers. To our knowledge, this is the first use of tree rings to assess timber origins in the southwestern United States. We found that the Chuska and Zuni Mountains (>75 km distant) were the most likely sources, accounting for 70% of timbers. Most notably, procuremen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an independent test of origin for the Plaza Tree, we compared the single tree-ring width series of JPB-99 to each tree-ring site chronology across the network of eight sites surrounding the San Juan Basin (Guiterman et al 2016). Ideally, we would also compare JPB-99 to a control site in Chaco Canyon, but there is no local tree-ring master chronology that extends back in time early enough (i.e., AD 700s–900s) to directly compare with the JPB-99.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As an independent test of origin for the Plaza Tree, we compared the single tree-ring width series of JPB-99 to each tree-ring site chronology across the network of eight sites surrounding the San Juan Basin (Guiterman et al 2016). Ideally, we would also compare JPB-99 to a control site in Chaco Canyon, but there is no local tree-ring master chronology that extends back in time early enough (i.e., AD 700s–900s) to directly compare with the JPB-99.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, we would also compare JPB-99 to a control site in Chaco Canyon, but there is no local tree-ring master chronology that extends back in time early enough (i.e., AD 700s–900s) to directly compare with the JPB-99. A chronology built from Chaco great-house timbers also cannot be used because it would contain a majority of nonlocal trees (Guiterman et al 2016). The oldest known local tree from Chaco Canyon is a remnant Douglas fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii ; LTRR specimen CHM-190) that was found on the ground near the East Community great house (29Mc 560), dating to AD 917–1574 (Windes 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samples were precisely crossdated using local tree‐ring chronologies (Guiterman , Guiterman et al. ). In the event that a specimen could not be crossdated by visual and/or skeleton‐plot techniques, we measured the growth patterns and used the program COFECHA (Holmes ) to aid in identifying dates that we checked visually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD 800 to 1200), when the canyon emerged as the core of a regional socioeconomic system extending across the Colorado Plateau (Lekson 2006). Strontium isotope analyses are prominent in these approaches (Benson et al 2003; Benson et al 2006; English et al 2001; Grimstead et al 2015; Guiterman, Swetnam, and Dean 2016; Reynolds et al 2005) but with ambiguous results because 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios do not clearly differentiate Chaco Canyon from other potential long-distance sources (Drake et al 2014; Wills, Drake, and Dorshow 2014). Grimstead, Quade, and Stiner (2016) have used oxygen isotope analyses to assess the importation of animal resources into Chaco, but they did not include (or have access to) modern fauna from Chaco Canyon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%