1996
DOI: 10.1016/0368-2048(95)02495-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure study of Eu intermetallic compounds by photoelectron spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(c), in contrast, the 4f spectrum of the EuO compound (ii) shows a large additional multiplet structure in the binding energy region from 5-13 eV below E F , which corresponds to the 4f 6 → 4f 5 final-state multiplet of trivalent Eu 3+ . This broad final-state structure is observed in accordance with previous experimental works on Eu 3+ compounds [23][24][25][26] and calculated multiplet lines 21,27 [see Fig. 4(e)].…”
Section: Haxpes: Eu 4 F Valence Bandssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…4(c), in contrast, the 4f spectrum of the EuO compound (ii) shows a large additional multiplet structure in the binding energy region from 5-13 eV below E F , which corresponds to the 4f 6 → 4f 5 final-state multiplet of trivalent Eu 3+ . This broad final-state structure is observed in accordance with previous experimental works on Eu 3+ compounds [23][24][25][26] and calculated multiplet lines 21,27 [see Fig. 4(e)].…”
Section: Haxpes: Eu 4 F Valence Bandssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Eu 3d level for EuCo 2 Si 2 from XPS (upper line-sample cleaved in ultra-high vacuum and lower line-sample cleaned by argon-ion sputtering; relative vertical scaling was adjusted to constant sum of Eu 3+ 3d 5/2 and Eu 2+ 3d 5/2 intensities). EuCo 2 Si 2 , similarly to other intermetallic compounds containing trivalent europium, EuPd 3 and EuPt 5 [14]. Details of these investigations will be published elsewhere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4). A comparison of the Eu 2+ :Eu 3+ ratios depicted from 3d and 4d levels is a good indicator if there is a significant difference between bulk and surface europium valence-the 3d level is more surface sensitive [14]; such a comparison for the cleaved sample gives a ratio Eu 2+ :Eu 3+ of 1.6(1) for the 3d level and 0.5(1) for the 4d level, which indicates a surface valence transition of europium in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface shifted feature in Eu compounds is well known. [30][31][32][33][34] The 0.75 eV feature corresponds to 'bulk' Eu 2+ 4f states while the 'surface' Eu 2+ 4f feature occurs at 1.6 eV, with Ni 3d states spread between 1 -3 eV binding energy. 35,36 Very weak features are also found in the range of 4 -12 eV and we discuss its origin in the following.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%