2016
DOI: 10.1002/pip.2764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of the Zn(O,S)/Cu(In,Ga)Se2thin-film solar cell interface

Abstract: The electronic band alignment of the Zn(O,S)/Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 interface in high-efficiency thin-film solar cells was derived using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, ultra-violet photoelectron spectroscopy, and inverse photoemission spectroscopy. Similar to the CdS/Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 system, we find an essentially flat (small-spike) conduction band alignment (here: a conduction band offset of (0.09 ± 0.20) eV), allowing for largely unimpeded electron transfer and forming a likely basis for the success of high-efficienc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(52 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CBO of the hetero interface is sufficiently flat (with a small spike) providing better electron flow and a good blocking layer for the majority carriers and hence reduces the interface recombination. Furthermore, the band-gap tuning is possible in Zn(O,S) buffer layers by varying the [S/S + O] ratio [119,120]. Even a minimal bandgap of 2.6 eV can be achieved with S/S + O = 45% which is 0.2 eV larger than CdS, thus avoiding the absorption losses.…”
Section: Cds-free Buffer Layer In Cigse Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CBO of the hetero interface is sufficiently flat (with a small spike) providing better electron flow and a good blocking layer for the majority carriers and hence reduces the interface recombination. Furthermore, the band-gap tuning is possible in Zn(O,S) buffer layers by varying the [S/S + O] ratio [119,120]. Even a minimal bandgap of 2.6 eV can be achieved with S/S + O = 45% which is 0.2 eV larger than CdS, thus avoiding the absorption losses.…”
Section: Cds-free Buffer Layer In Cigse Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the limited band gap of CdS (2.4 eV) leads to parasitic high-energy photon losses in the CdS buffer layer 6 . Hence, promising alternatives like indium sulfide 4,7 or zinc oxysulfide [Zn(O,S)] 8,9 with larger band gaps (and different interface chemistries) are being investigated. Such alternative buffer layers are intensively pursued for the (related) Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se) 2 material system, and there is a growing interest to also investigate the impact of alternative buffer layers on the kesterite-based solar cell 5,6,[10][11][12] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, their cost-effectiveness and easy processing are well known. Recently, CIGS thin-film photovoltaic devices reached a record solar efficiency of 22.3% [1]. Among thin film technologies, CIGS solar cells have achieved highest conversion efficiencies at laboratory scale [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%