2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2cp41996c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure and bonding of lanthanoid(iii) carbonates

Abstract: Quantum chemical calculations were employed to elucidate the structural and bonding properties of La(III) and Lu(III) carbonates. These elements are found at the beginning and end of the lanthanoid series, respectively, and we investigate two possible metal-carbonate stoichiometries (tri- and tetracarbonates) considering all possible carbonate binding motifs, i.e., combinations of mono- and bidentate coordination. In the gas phase, the most stable tricarbonate complexes coordinate all carbonates in a bidentate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(80 reference statements)
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results yielded an average Y-O distance of 2.37 ± 0.02 Å for the Y-sol sample and 2.38 ± 0.01 Å for YSO4-sol ( Table 1). The intense peak in the FT function at 2.38 Å for the two aqueous references represents the first solvation shell, and its asymmetry reveals a distribution of Y-O interatomic distances, as reported previously by Lindqvist et al 24 The coordination numbers (CN) were 7.6 ± 1.9 and 7.9 ± 0.9 for Y-sol and YSO4-sol, respectively, which are close to the expected value of 8 for 23,24,28 Likewise aqueous REE carbonate and phosphate complexes, [31][32][33] aqueous Y-SO4 ion-pairs form inner-sphere complexes. This result contrasts with other ligands such as chloride, which hardly forms inner sphere complexes at similar concentrations to those used in this study.…”
Section: Analytical Techniquessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The results yielded an average Y-O distance of 2.37 ± 0.02 Å for the Y-sol sample and 2.38 ± 0.01 Å for YSO4-sol ( Table 1). The intense peak in the FT function at 2.38 Å for the two aqueous references represents the first solvation shell, and its asymmetry reveals a distribution of Y-O interatomic distances, as reported previously by Lindqvist et al 24 The coordination numbers (CN) were 7.6 ± 1.9 and 7.9 ± 0.9 for Y-sol and YSO4-sol, respectively, which are close to the expected value of 8 for 23,24,28 Likewise aqueous REE carbonate and phosphate complexes, [31][32][33] aqueous Y-SO4 ion-pairs form inner-sphere complexes. This result contrasts with other ligands such as chloride, which hardly forms inner sphere complexes at similar concentrations to those used in this study.…”
Section: Analytical Techniquessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These findings for the lutetium halides are in line with similar findings for various lanthanide oxo‐compounds (carbonates, phosphates, borates, etc.) Closed shell freezing is more serious than the effective‐core pseudopotential approach, which can simulate the shell relaxation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Another recent theoretical contribution in this area was a report by Sinha et al on [Nd(CO 3 ) 4 ] 5À using the Parameterized Model 3 (PM3) semi-empirical method. 16 Notwithstanding these two studies, the first quantitative and systematic theoretical study undertaken to characterize the structures and bonding of lanthanoid(III) tri-and tetra-carbonates was reported recently by Jeanvoine et al 17 They studied different clusters by means of Density Functional Theory (DFT) pointing out that: (1) in the gas phase the most stable structure is the full bi-dentate for tri-carbonate complexes, while for the tetra-carbonate complexes it is the full mono-dentate; (2) in water, modeled there as a continuum -i.e. no explicit water molecules were considered -in both cases the full bi-dentate complexes are the most stable structures; (3) the tri-carbonate structure is more stable than the tetra-carbonate one; (4) the Ln(III)-carbonate interaction is mainly ionic, thus allowing use of a simple, physics based, interaction potential to study such complexes in liquid water by means of classical molecular dynamics simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%