2008
DOI: 10.1186/cc7134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic patient record use during ward rounds: a qualitative study of interaction between medical staff

Abstract: Introduction Electronic patient records are becoming more common in critical care. As their design and implementation are optimized for single users rather than for groups, we aimed to understand the differences in interaction between members of a multidisciplinary team during ward rounds using an electronic, as opposed to paper, patient medical record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Time constraints, exacerbated by duty hour reforms, put pressure on attending physicians to expedite rounds and prioritize medical education over the inclusion of their non-physician colleagues. Similarly, the organization of MIRs attendees and equipment in the ICU hallway-in concentric circles that located physicians in the center, and nonphysicians on the periphery-limited participants' ability to collaborate by creating a physical barrier to communication (Morrison et al 2008). This barrier of white coats seemed to promote a combative relationship between provider groups by making professional identity more visible and more salient, thereby creating barriers to collaborative working during MIRs (Burford 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time constraints, exacerbated by duty hour reforms, put pressure on attending physicians to expedite rounds and prioritize medical education over the inclusion of their non-physician colleagues. Similarly, the organization of MIRs attendees and equipment in the ICU hallway-in concentric circles that located physicians in the center, and nonphysicians on the periphery-limited participants' ability to collaborate by creating a physical barrier to communication (Morrison et al 2008). This barrier of white coats seemed to promote a combative relationship between provider groups by making professional identity more visible and more salient, thereby creating barriers to collaborative working during MIRs (Burford 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also a number of studies that examine the impact of technology on healthcare professional work per se but which place little emphasis on the conditions under which it enables or constrains change or the possibility of technology enactment once introduced (Aarts et al, 2007;Abraham & Junglas, 2011;Harding & Taylor, 1997;Håland, 2011;Morrison et al, 2008;Reich, 2012;Vikkelsø, 2005). For example, Håland (2011) examined how the introduction of an EPR in a Norwegian hospital affected clinical work practices and the identities of doctors, nurses and secretaries without considering explicitly the agency of technology in this process of change.…”
Section: A Theory Of Technological Affordancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morrison and colleagues [21] have carried out perhaps the most empirically-grounded study of the impact of a technological intervention on the structure of F-formations in their comparison of hospital ward rounds carried out before and after the introduction of electronic patient records. They describe how the diminished visibility of the electronic records on a small screen, compared with paper, impacted both the ability of consultants to lead discussion and of other medical staff to participate in the conversation.…”
Section: Background F-formations In Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%