2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.033
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic and thermodynamic criteria for the occurrence of high entropy alloys in metallic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
136
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 341 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
136
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper limit corresponds to the largest value of ΔH f for which the alloy does not phase separate due to the immiscibility of any pair of elements. The upper limit of the enthalpy range (37 meV) is chosen to include all known singe-phase alloys and it is consistent with the thermodynamic model presented by Poletti and Battezzati [16]. It is worth noting that T ann could be replaced by some critical temperature (T crit ), below which diffusion is sufficiently slow that the enthalpic driving force is insufficient to result in phase decomposition on a realizable time scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upper limit corresponds to the largest value of ΔH f for which the alloy does not phase separate due to the immiscibility of any pair of elements. The upper limit of the enthalpy range (37 meV) is chosen to include all known singe-phase alloys and it is consistent with the thermodynamic model presented by Poletti and Battezzati [16]. It is worth noting that T ann could be replaced by some critical temperature (T crit ), below which diffusion is sufficiently slow that the enthalpic driving force is insufficient to result in phase decomposition on a realizable time scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although there are several proposals regarding the stability of HEAs, much of the existing work uses semiempirical approaches based, for example, on HumeRothery rules, thus focusing on the differences of the atomic sizes (δ), electronegativities (Δχ), and electron-toatom ratio (e=a) [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Some approaches utilize calculation of phase diagrams methods [18], while others consider δ, the enthalpy of mixing (ΔH mix ), and the ideal entropy of mixing of the alloys to develop criteria for the phase stability [1,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach has been to utilise the empirical rules of Hume-Rothery 144,145 and/or accessible thermodynamic quantities to form parametric criteria for the stability of HEA solid solutions, which are fitted to experimental results. 152,159,163,173,[203][204][205]207,[252][253][254][255][256][257][258][259][260][261][262][263][264][265][266][267] These phase-selection rules for as-cast HEAs were recently reviewed by Wang et al 258 and Guo, 208 and are discussed briefly here.…”
Section: Phase Prediction and Alloy Selection In Heasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An atomistic simulation cell consisting of a BCC lattice with lattice constant 2.86A was created, with periodic boundary conditions along three orthogonal directions x= [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], y= [110] and z= [001], with dimensions of ~300A in each direction (~ 2 million atoms). BCC lattice sites were randomly occupied by Co, Fe, Ni, and Ti atoms to achieve an average composition Co16.67Fe36.67Ni16.67Ti30.…”
Section: Computational Model Of the Bcc Co1667fe3667ni1667ti30 Ranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of phases in a HEA system can be significantly smaller than the maximum number of phases present at equilibrium as predicted by the well-known Gibbs phase rule [1]. While many alloys that meet the definition of an HEA [2,3] contain multiple phases, including intermetallics [4,5], there are many single-phase systems [6]. These single-phase systems, both FCC and BCC, generally have unusually high yield strength and/or high ductility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%