2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5144722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron spin resonance with up to 20 spin sensitivity measured using a superconducting flux qubit

Abstract: We report on electron spin resonance spectroscopy measurements using a superconducting flux qubit with a sensing volume of 6 fl. The qubit is read out using a frequency-tunable Josephson bifurcation amplifier, which leads to an inferred measurement sensitivity of about 20 spins in a 1 s measurement. This sensitivity represents an order of magnitude improvement when compared to flux-qubit schemes using a direct current-superconducting quantum interference device switching readout. Furthermore, noise spectroscop… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dephasing during the sensing process is a main obstacle for quantum-enhanced sensing. In particular, it is known that time-inhomogeneous dephasing (non-Markovian dephasing) is relevant for magnetometry using solid-state systems, e.g., nitrogen-vacancy centers [48,[50][51][52] and flux qubits [53][54][55][56][57]. Here we explain the effect of time-inhomogeneous dephasing during the sensing process.…”
Section: Dephasingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Dephasing during the sensing process is a main obstacle for quantum-enhanced sensing. In particular, it is known that time-inhomogeneous dephasing (non-Markovian dephasing) is relevant for magnetometry using solid-state systems, e.g., nitrogen-vacancy centers [48,[50][51][52] and flux qubits [53][54][55][56][57]. Here we explain the effect of time-inhomogeneous dephasing during the sensing process.…”
Section: Dephasingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For this purpose, we could use a waveguide [10], a frequency tunable resonator [11], or a direct current-superconducting quantum interference device (dcSQUID) [2,12]. Among these approaches, a superconducting flux qubit (FQ) is promising and has already achieved a sensitivity of 20 spins/Hz 1/2 with a sensing volume of 6 fl for the ESR [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction.-Quantum metrology with entangled resources has been shown to reach the Heisenberg limit of sensitivity with respect to the number of qubits [1][2][3][4][5][6]. It may provide significant improvements for versatile applications such as atomic-frequency [7,8] and electron-spinresonance measurements [9][10][11], magnetometry [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], thermometry [20][21][22], and electrometer [23,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intractable noise characterization leads to inaccurate theoretical models and induces systematic errors in estimations. In practice, systematic errors are fatal to quantum metrology because they cannot be reduced even if the number of samples is increased, thus seriously limiting any sensitivity improvement [9,45]. Despite that systematic errors are typically present in experiments, there is as yet no general approach to dealing them, although some studies have tackled specific scenarios [46][47][48][49].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation