2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4940978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using a direct current-SQUID magnetometer directly coupled to an electron spin ensemble

Abstract: We demonstrate electron spin polarization detection and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy using a direct current superconducting quantum interference device (dc-SQUID) magnetometer. Our target electron spin ensemble is directly glued on the dc-SQUID magnetometer that detects electron spin polarization induced by a external magnetic field or EPR in micrometer-sized area. The minimum distinguishable number of polarized spins and sensing volume of the electron spin polarization detection and the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the ∼μm size of the SQUID and the fast decay of the microwave field, the effective detected sample volume is estimated as in Ref. [27] to be ∼μm 3 size, which corresponds to ∼ 10 7 spins in the case of the CaWO 4 :Gd 3+ sample discussed here.…”
Section: Fig 1 (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the ∼μm size of the SQUID and the fast decay of the microwave field, the effective detected sample volume is estimated as in Ref. [27] to be ∼μm 3 size, which corresponds to ∼ 10 7 spins in the case of the CaWO 4 :Gd 3+ sample discussed here.…”
Section: Fig 1 (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area is ≈ 150 µm 2 and the effective sensing thickness can be estimated to be ∼ 1 µm [41]. This gives a ∼ 150 µm 3 = 0.15 pl sensing volume, comparable to the sensing volume of EPR using dc-SQUIDs [21] and the smallest sensing volume of EPR using superconducting resonators [10]. The spin ensemble used in the experiment has a concentration of 3.7 × 10 18 spins/cm 3 , which means ≈ 5.5 × 10 8 spins are located within our sensing volume.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Using this value, we infer a measurement sensitivity of ≈ 1.5 × 10 4 spins, within the range of sensitivities of parametric-amplified pulsed EPR using typical superconducting lumped-element resonators [42,43]. The sensitivity is also about two orders of magnitude better than the sensitivity of EPR using dc-SQUIDs [21]. We note that the repetition time in our experiment were 20 times shorter than the repetition time in dc-SQUID EPR measurements, and thus we expect a factor of √ 20 ≈ 4.5 improvement in sensitivity from increased repetition rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations