1985
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.32.6319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron localization and interaction effects in palladium and palladium-gold films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this eventuality is very unlikely, given the completely different nature of the two resistors. A weak increase of resistance of the palladium film with decreasing temperature is indeed predicted by electron localization theory, 8 but it has been estimated to be negligible for our case.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this eventuality is very unlikely, given the completely different nature of the two resistors. A weak increase of resistance of the palladium film with decreasing temperature is indeed predicted by electron localization theory, 8 but it has been estimated to be negligible for our case.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…1 The value predicted by the free-electron model Eq. ͑2͒, using electronic and elastic parameters of palladium reported in literature, 8,11 is roughly an order of magnitude smaller. Therefore, the simple clean 3D free-electron model predicts the right exponent n but fails to predict the magnitude of the e-p rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, two contributions to these corrections due to the WAL effect and the 2D electron–electron interaction are taken into account ΔG T=e2πh []αq+134Fσln[]TTcwhere the first term is due to the WAL effect, with α being the same constant as in Equation and q as the temperature coefficient of the phase coherence length l ϕ ∝ T − q /2 . The second term is referring to the electron–electron interaction, where F σ is depending on the electron screening length and expected to be in the range between 0 and 1 . For strong spin–orbit interaction F σ = 0 is expected, but negative values have also been reported .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured resistance of the two parallel resistors at T=4.18 K is R s =8.72 Ω, leading to a nominal resistivity ρ =2.6×10 −7 Ωm. The corresponding elastic mean free path is estimated as l ≈ 3.3 nm using palladium electronic parameters reported in literature [9]. Thus, l is not substantially limited by the film thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%