2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromyographic analysis of physical examination tests for type II superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although SLAP lesion test assessment is prevalent in the literature, comparison between studies is difficult due to the lack of overlap of tests between similar studies. However, two studies support the findings of this study in that ACPU and Bicep II have both been reported to elicit large LHBB EMG amplitudes 1030 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although SLAP lesion test assessment is prevalent in the literature, comparison between studies is difficult due to the lack of overlap of tests between similar studies. However, two studies support the findings of this study in that ACPU and Bicep II have both been reported to elicit large LHBB EMG amplitudes 1030 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Clinically based evaluations of SLAP lesion tests account for the majority of studies to date; however, studies have also assessed test accuracy by attempting to validate the fundamental design behind various SLAP lesion tests 10, 15, 26, 30 . Provocative SLAP lesion tests, by definition, function to provoke labral symptoms (primarily pain) as a positive diagnostic sign, by reenacting one of two injury mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EMG activity levels of the biceps brachii long head for RSER testing in the current study are higher than those reported in the biceps load test using similar methods (Shanley et al, 2008), and also in comparison with other tests for SLAP lesions (Swaringen et al, 2006). The biceps load test for SLAP lesions resists elbow flexion from a similar position of shoulder abduction and elbow flexion (Kim et al, 2001a).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The biceps load test recruited only minimal activity in biceps brachii long head (17.6% MVIC), probably because elbow flexion selectively recruits the brachialis muscle (Shanley et al, 2008). Although Swaringen et al (2006) did not evaluate the RSER test and the lack of clarity regarding the units reported in the article make comparison of data difficult, the comparison with the results of Shanley et al provides further evidence that resisted forearm supination is the key component in contributing to the moderately strong level of activity in biceps brachii long head during the RSER test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%