2020
DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.190130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction: A Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Prospective Study

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the electromagnetic-type low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (Li-ESWT) in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Materials and Methods: The randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind prospective study was performed at two referral hospitals. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive sham or Li-ESWT for 6 weeks. ED was evaluated at screening and at 4 and 7 weeks after treatment. Participants were asked to complete … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent study of LI-ESWT was published by Kim et al who measured outcome by IIEF-ef and EHS in a heterogeneous group of 81 participants with ED. 26 A significant increase in IIEF-ef score of 5.1 (medians) was seen in the active group at 7 weeks of follow-up. In addition, the proportion of participant in the active group with EHS >3 improved from 52.6% at baseline to 89.5% at 7 weeks of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The most recent study of LI-ESWT was published by Kim et al who measured outcome by IIEF-ef and EHS in a heterogeneous group of 81 participants with ED. 26 A significant increase in IIEF-ef score of 5.1 (medians) was seen in the active group at 7 weeks of follow-up. In addition, the proportion of participant in the active group with EHS >3 improved from 52.6% at baseline to 89.5% at 7 weeks of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, it is still a controversial methodology in this respect. Multiple randomised clinical trials (Kalyvianakis & Hatzichristou, 2017; Kim et al., 2020; Srini et al., 2015; Vardi et al., 2012) and meta‐analyses (Clavijo et al., 2017; Dong et al., 2019; Rizk et al., 2018) have demonstrated a significant benefit of Li‐ESWT in the treatment of ED.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I n t o t a l , 7 / 1 1 ( 6 4 % ) s h a m -c o n t r o l l e d t r i a l s showed a statistically significant increase in IIEF scores in the treatment arm when compared with the control arm. IIEF scores (either IIEF-EF or IIEF-5) in the treatment arm ranged from +1-12.5 points, depending on the specific study (32,35,36,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42). 3/11 trials (27%) did not show a benefit favoring LiSWT over sham (33,34,37).…”
Section: Randomized Sham-controlled Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since that time, multiple retrospective, single-arm prospective, and randomized-controlled trials have been published. This includes 11 randomized, sham-controlled trials evaluating the impact of LiSWT on men with vasculogenic ED (Table 2) (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42). Results are somewhat mixed owing in part to differences in patient populations, study design, outcomes assessed, follow-up duration, and the type of shockwave technology utilized.…”
Section: Randomized Sham-controlled Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%